xml-dev - RE: Well-formed vs. valid

["Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>]

At 10:51 AM 2/25/99 -0700, roddey@us.ibm.com wrote:
>FYI, our (IBM's) new version 2 architecture parsers do this. We have a
>pluggable architecture, and one of the plug ins is a validator. The low
>level scanner uses this to validate content before it sends it out through
>the internal even APIs. So, if you are wiring together a SAX style parser,
>you just wire the internal events to the SAX events and you have a
>validating SAX parser (actually we have that combination already provided
>for you as a canned parser, but you can do other variations as well.)

Big question: can I plug someone else's SAX parser into your scanner, and
then have your validation component work on my SAX events?  While it's
unlikely that I'd want to plug a different SAX parser in, it's quite
possible that I'd want to work with the SAX events (transforming with XT,
for instance) before performing validation.

Simon St.Laurent
XML: A Primer / Building XML Applications (April)
Sharing Bandwidth / Cookies
http://www.simonstl.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)