[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
- To: "Don Park" <donpark@quake.net>, <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Sun, 07 Feb 1999 17:13:16 -0800
At 04:01 PM 2/7/99 -0800, Don Park wrote:
>I am disappointed that you chose to follow this line of thinking.
...
>Not really at my best,
Yeah, I wasn't either yesterday. Apologies to everyone here for being
nasty. Everyone in the XML activity takes the opinions expressed here
very seriously.
I gotta say, though, the XML spec now feels to me like a ramshackle
compromise that only just barely works, while namespaces do one simple
thing and nail it down tight as a drum. Here's how bad it is; I'm
working on an Annotated namespaces, just like annotated XML - and I'm
having serious difficulty figuring out what to write. -Tim
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
