[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
- To: Bill la Forge <b.laforge@jxml.com>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 1999 16:46:25 +0000
Bill la Forge wrote:
>
> The advantage of SAX is its independence from DOM,
> as that allows for the development of SAX components
> (filters) which can be used for
> 1. Preprocessing events before they are used to build the DOM;
> 2. DOM construction;
> 3. Output formatting from a DOM or without a DOM;
> 4. Simple document transformations.
>
> What I'm more inclined to do in this SAX/DOM marriage,
> is to create an alternative to the SAX helper class, AttributeListImpl,
> which also implements
> public Attr setAttribute(Attr newAttr);
> and
> public Attr removeAttribute(String name);
> and
> public Attr getAttribute(String name);
>
This is a nice idea. Factor out the common, helper
objects used by both the document-oriented DOM and the
event-oriented SAX. This would be pretty. It would allow
a marriage, but yet keep their independence (which is the
key to any successful marriage).
:) Clark
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
