[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
- To: Rob Schoening <rschoening@unforgettable.com>
- Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 21:07:57 +0000
Rob Schoening wrote:
>
> XML desperately needs an XDK. Moreover, the XDK's component parts
> need to be developed as if they were part of a whole.
This would be _wonderful_ for example, SAX and DOM should be
designed/written so that they are complementary. So that:
I could do:
SAX -> DOM -> SAX' Where Events(SAX') = Events(SAX)
and DOM -> SAX -> DOM' Where State(DOM') = State(DOM)
:) Clark
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: XDK
- From: "Jeffrey E. Sussna" <jes@kuantech.com>
- Prev by Date:
RE: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
- Next by Date:
Re: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
- Previous by thread:
Re: What Clean Specs Achieve, WAS: Colonialism, SAX, Java, and Namespaces
- Next by thread:
RE: XDK
- Index(es):
|