[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Robb Shecter <shecter@darmstadt.gmd.de>
- To: Nigel Hutchison <nwoh@software-ag.de>
- Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 17:51:38 +0100
Nigel Hutchison wrote:
> Then a server could project its own GUI api and leave it to the client side
> to choose C++, Java etc to build the interface at run time.
Yes.
> I suspect that
> in most cases the bandwidth required to shift the XML GUI description would
> be quite a bit less than the
> compiled java classes. If this is so than "Even Cooler" would be XML GUI
> interpreter built into a Internet Browser.
How about this: Have one XSL document per client side scripting language. That is, different
XSL documents could implement:
Component-XML->DHTML (This particular one would give you your "Even Cooler" idea.)
Component-XML->Java BeanShell
Component-XML->Smalltalk
etc...
...then, a client side browser applies whatever XSL template is best for it, gets the the
resulting kind of script it understands, and on the fly generates a UI.
- Robb
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
- Follow-Ups:
- XML Mail
- From: Clark Evans <clark.evans@manhattanproject.com>
|