xml-dev - RE: Streaming XML? [was Re: XML Information Set Requirements..]

["Paul Butkiewicz" <arabbit@earthlink.net>]

Hi Tim.  I did some work with this a few months ago and took the each tick
is a document approach. Unfortunately, I haven't really revisited it much
since.  If you're interested, check out
http://home.earthlink.net/~arabbit/xmlnet  I'm not trying to sell anything
(there was a commercial idea with some friends originally, but, eh. . .),
and you can have the source code if you want.  Just curious, if you wanted
someone to bounce ideas off of, etc.

Paul Butkiewicz
arabbit@earthlink.net

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xml-dev@ic.ac.uk [mailto:owner-xml-dev@ic.ac.uk]On Behalf Of
Tim.Shaw@wdr.com
Sent: Monday, February 22, 1999 4:39 AM
To: cowan@locke.ccil.org
Cc: xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Subject: Streaming XML? [was Re: XML Information Set Requirements..]


     This was one of my initial concerns on the DOM - I too will be working
     on ticker-type streams.

     I nearly jumped in early in this conversation to agree with the
     'others' - ie the SAX approach is just as important as DOM and the 2
     should both be of similar (standards) status.

     I held off because I'm new to XML, and I wasn't sure if my alternative
     wasn't too obvious to mention.

     I thought that each tick should be treated as a document. The client
     would have to arrange that each 'document' so received would have to
     be built, and then a document fragment extracted and inserted into a
     client-held document (updating display etc. via DOM events as
     appropriate).

     This approach requires the client of the XML data-source to be aware
     of this of course, which may be a killer for genericity.

     Am I way off base here - and if so, could someone point me to current
     thinking on this issue (I've browsed _a lot_ and seen little/nothing).

     Thanks

     tim


______________________________ Reply Separator
_________________________________
Subject: Re: XML Information Set Requirements, W3C Note 18-February
Author:  cowan (cowan@locke.ccil.org) at unix,mime
Date:    19/02/99 22:06


Nathan Kurz wrote:

> And if the stream is continuous (for example, an XML
> stock ticker) even the concept of a well-formed stream seems tenuous.

It's not clear that XML supports infinitely long streams (where the
end-tag of the document element is *never* reached).

--
John Cowan      http://www.ccil.org/~cowan              cowan@ccil.org
        You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
        You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
                Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN
981
-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following
message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN
981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following
message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)