Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: firstname.lastname@example.org (Peter Seibel)
- To: XML Developers' List <email@example.com>
- Date: Wed, 03 Feb 1999 17:00:57 -0800
Is there anyone out there who can characterize the problems/challenges/best
practices when it comes to parsing XML? Looking (briefly) at the source of
a couple parsers (Lark, Microsoft's, and XP) it looks like the parsers are
some flavor of hand written recursive descent. (Well, Lark has that funky
hand-coded DFA thing which I didn't really spend much time trying to grok
-- that's not really recursive descent as I understand things.) Is there a
reason no one seems to be using parser generators (like ANTLR or JavaCC)?
This may be more a question about the limitations of those tools which were
designed for parsing things that look a lot more like Algol than XML does.
P.S. Are there any parsers out there that actually return DOM objects?
Peter Seibel Perl/Java/English Hacker firstname.lastname@example.org
Is Windows98 Y2K compliant?
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:email@example.com
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:email@example.com the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org)