[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: "Bill la Forge" <b.laforge@jxml.com>
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 06:32:07 -0500 (EST)
Bill la Forge writes:
> The upgrade needs to be worth doing, but for more than one
> reason. Feature negotiation alone is not quite enough.
Yes, but my original proposal was not limited to feature negotiation
-- it also included the ability to add and negotiate new handler types
at runtime.
People will upgrade because they want to use the new handlers that are
implemented with ModSAX, not because of any elegance or inelegance in
ModSAX itself.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
