[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Brownell <db@eng.sun.com>
- To: Lars Marius Garshol <larsga@ifi.uio.no>
- Date: Mon, 08 Mar 1999 22:20:57 -0800
Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
>
> * Bill la Forge
>
> | So that's why I'm butting in here. I think an open standards process
> | is important for individuals and small companies. We need to do what
> | we can to keep the ball rolling here.
>
> We are certainly in heartfelt agreement here. :)
Gee, as a wage-slave working for a big company, I hope that I'm
not _too_ excluded from the discussions ... :-)
Seriously: my personal model is a lot more akin to the original
IETF style "running code and working consensus" model than most
existing standards bodies. I'm a lot happier with standards that
come from such a process than from ones that involve fat specs
that can't be implemented. Writing code is generally more fun
than specs -- though an elegant spec is also a work of art!
- Dave
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
