[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: James Robertson <jamesr@steptwo.com.au>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 16:46:56 +1000
At 01:44 31/07/1999 , David Megginson wrote:
>Jeff Greif writes:
>
> > I'm not sure what the advantage of RDF is here, in comparison with
> > using an ordinary .xml file (changing rdf:about to a namespace
> > declaration somewhere and providing a DTD or XML Schema to specify
> > an apt:Airport). An airport is a resource, so you might want a
> > description of a bunch of them, but I'm having trouble finding a
> > context in which this is metadata, not data.
>
>Who said anything about metadata?
>
>RDF is a general format for serializing entities and their
>relationships -- sure it's useful for metadata, but it's main use (I
>think) is as a more abstract layer on top of XML for exchanging
>objects.
Wouldn't a validatable format with a DTD
be more useful for storing data?
ie. plain vanilla XML?
Otherwise, aren't we advocating abandoning XML for a
another format? One that loses the ability to be
verified, except with the use of custom-written software.
In other words, if RDF is intended for storage of data,
what's XML for?
Hmmm.
J
-------------------------
James Robertson
Step Two Designs Pty Ltd
SGML, XML & HTML Consultancy
http://www.steptwo.com.au/
jamesr@steptwo.com.au
"Beyond the Idea"
ACN 081 019 623
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|