[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- To: <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Sat, 31 Jul 1999 06:49:30 -0400 (EDT)
James Robertson writes:
> Wouldn't a validatable format with a DTD
> be more useful for storing data?
>
> ie. plain vanilla XML?
Why not just ASCII?
> Otherwise, aren't we advocating abandoning XML for a
> another format? One that loses the ability to be
> verified, except with the use of custom-written software.
I could write a DTD for my airport example if I wanted, but I see
little value; instead, I'd probably use the W3C's proposed RDF-schema
language, since it works at the right semantic level.
Besides, while DTDs are useful, they allow validation of only a tiny
subset of business rules: as I mentioned in a recent discussion within
the W3C, a DTD can ensure that HTML <h1> doesn't appear within <p>,
but it cannot ensure that the text in it is actually a descriptive
section title.
> In other words, if RDF is intended for storage of data,
> what's XML for?
If XML is intended for the representation of documents, what's ASCII
for?
Good application design (like good system design) requires a layered
approach:
- if a lot of people need to extract a stream of characters from many
different byte encodings, you invent a standard (like Unicode) so
that they can all refer to a common set of characters in the
abstract;
- if a lot of people need to extract a tree structure from a
stream of characters, you invent a standard (like SGML or XML) so
that they can all use standard software tools rather than rolling
their own;
- if a lot of people need to relabel the tree nodes with
universally-identifiable and unique names, you invent a standard
(like Namespaces in XML or Architectural Forms) so that they can all
use standard software tools rather than rolling their own;
- if a lot of people need to extract a set of objects from the tree,
you invent a standard (like RDF or XMI) so that they can all use
standard software tools rather than rolling their own.
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david@megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|