[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Mike Spreitzer" <spreitze@parc.xerox.com>
- To: "'Paul Prescod'" <paul@prescod.net>, <xml-dev@ic.ac.uk>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:35:00 PDT
> Also I'd like your opinion on the maintainability of this route. It
> seems to me that once you generate the DTD and distribute it to your
> business partners, internal customers and so forth, it takes on a life
> of its own separate from the UML model. Changes must now be considered
> in terms of backwards compatibility at the XML, not UML level.
> Documentation is mostly at the XML level, etc.
Why wouldn't you distribute the real source (XMI?)? That seems better
than distributing something derived in a standard way from the source.
Mike
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev@ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo@ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa@ic.ac.uk)
|
