Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "John Evdemon" <email@example.com>
- To: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2000 22:02:50 -0500
MQSeries is IBM's message oriented middleware. Its been around much longer
than MSMQ and is available on almost any platform.
A queuing approach would provide a much more durable/scalable design than a
simple POP3 approach - especially with regard to "lost" messages.
From: email@example.com [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of
Sent: Monday, February 07, 2000 7:24 PM
To: Hunter, David; email@example.com
Subject: Re: Asynchronous message queue by SMTP&POP3
I'm happy to see so many responses!
> Another possibility is "XML via regular message queue", using something
> MSMQ from Microsoft, or MQ Series from IBM. So instead of creating some
> components which know how to monitor email Inboxes, your components can
> monitor queues.
Yes, MSMQ is definitely better solution (I don't know MQ Series of IBM)
But the downside is that we need SQL Server as a storage of MSMQ. Cost
is one problem, and another problem is that they are difficult to deploy
(at least for me) and difficult to maintain for many administrators.
... or is it easy to deploy? My experience with MSMQ/SQL Server is