Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Daniel.Veillard@w3.org
- Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 09:03:47 -0500
At 10:08 AM 2/9/00 +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> If the WG didn't provide a response it's an error and as staff contact I'm
>partly reponsible for this. Is there any specific comment you made that
>you would like being answered now, please point me to it I will dig in
>the WG archives to provide the answer.
Getting answers to year-old posts is not very exciting, I'm afraid, though
some of my more recent comments on the design of XHTML, mostly minor nits,
appear to have gone to /dev/null as well.
The point isn't that I want specific answers to _my_ questions - the point
is that public forums where the W3C has no obligation to answer discussion
are more or less useless. Why should I post to a comments list when the
result, for more than a year, is silence? Why should anyone post to those
lists, except to tilt at windmills?
> Your posts to the comment list about the Requirements document (XLink)
>and about Xlink/XPointer design had been reviewed by the WG, like any other
>sensible post on the matter sent to the list. Sorry if we didn't provide
>direct specific feedback. The review is done in a rather asynchronous way
>(i.e. when the WG schedule meeting time to discuss those), so it tend to
>bring the interactivity close to 0. The best way is when someone in the
>group specifically monitors the list and answer immediately the simple
>question. However when it's about a design choice this has to go through the
>full WG process and then cannot be answered immediately.
While it's vaguely gratifying to hear that someone read the messages, this
barely sounds like a process, and does nothing to sustain the forum or
public interest in the forum. Even simple questions about the substance of
specs - I guess they're design issues - rarely receive timely answers.
I keep hearing that the W3C's resources are badly stretched, so there
probably isn't time or money for such work. Making the public lists a more
important part of the W3C development process might pay dividends, however.
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth