[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@kimo.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
- To: Daniel.Veillard@w3.org, "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>, XML-Dev Mailing list <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2000 13:02:31 +0100
Daniel Vellard wrote:
> If the WG didn't provide a response it's an error and as staff contact I'm
> partly reponsible for this. Is there any specific comment you made that
> you would like being answered now, please point me to it I will dig in
> the WG archives to provide the answer.
If that holds not only for Simon, I would like to ask why XML schema
needs both <element> and <type>. It looks like they both correspond
to the class concept in OOP. See
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2000JanMar/0101.html
Best regards
Stefan
--
Stefan Haustein
University of Dortmund
Computer Science VIII
www-ai.cs.uni-dortmund.de
|
