Lists Home |
Date Index |
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <email@example.com>
- To: Daniel.Veillard@w3.org
- Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2000 11:23:34 -0500
At 03:51 PM 2/9/00 +0100, Daniel Veillard wrote:
>On Wed, Feb 09, 2000 at 09:03:47AM -0500, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>> The point isn't that I want specific answers to _my_ questions - the point
>> is that public forums where the W3C has no obligation to answer discussion
>> are more or less useless. Why should I post to a comments list when the
>> result, for more than a year, is silence? Why should anyone post to those
>> lists, except to tilt at windmills?
>Silence doesn't mean ignoring. If this was the case I bet 80% of XML-DEV'er
>should quit the list instead of filling a /dev/null in their machine.
XML-Dev has a much higher rate of sustained threads than any of the W3C
lists - www-style is the only list I've found with traffic or a response
ratio any place close to this forum. XML-Dev has something most of the
W3C public lists lack: a community of interested people, talking back and
forth about issues that are important to them.
>From the outside, the difference between silence and ignoring is pretty
much nothing. Without some kind of feedback, preferably public feedback,
those lists aren't ever going to attract a community. That may well be
what the W3C wants, but it makes it hard to tell people to post their
concerns to these forums.
> yes as explained, because per the process a WG member can't just assert
>something publicly before being sure it's the WG opinion (he can do it as
>an individual, but that wouldn't count as much). And design issues takes
>time to get reviewed.
Maybe it's time for the overall process to get reviewed.
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth