[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Michael Fuller <msf@io.mds.rmit.edu.au>
- To: Arjun Ray <aray@q2.net>
- Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2000 18:05:16 +1100
Arjun Ray wrote:
> David Megginson wrote:
> > David Wang wrote:
> > > On a related topic, I'm also wondering about the health of AF -
> > It's pretty-much dead in the water for now -- almost nobody uses AFs
> > or even bothers to defend them
> This is the saddest part. The W3C is gung-ho on namespaces, and an
> integral part of the boosterism surrounding this bogosity is the
> obligatory potshot at AFs.
I'm curious: what _are_ the potshots?
Seriously: are there genuine issues, other than "Not Invented Here"?
True shortcomings of some sort that precluded architectural forms
being used as the basis for a namespace-like framework?
Arjun?
Someone from the other side of the debate ;-) to Arjun?
Michael, curiously.
(Town Hall topic, perhaps? Pity I won't be there...)
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************
|
