[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Jim Layer <JBLayer@netscape.net>
- To: xml-dev@xml.org
- Date: 25 Feb 00 11:42:57 EST
David Megginson wrote:
> Basically, we tried to make SAX1 easy to implement and we tried to
> make it easy to use, but where there was a conflict, we almost always
> favoured the implementors over the users. I know that sounds
> completely wrong, but it seems to work. For a theoretical
> justification of this approach, see one of my most-quoted references
>
> http://www.naggum.no/worse-is-better.html
Hmmm... SAX-as-virus. Touche...
BTW, SAX2 Beta1 has "infected" Xerces-J V1.0.2 ;)
http://xml.apache.org/dist/
Regards,
Jim Layer
____________________________________________________________________
Get your own FREE, personal Netscape WebMail account today at http://webmail.netscape.com.
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************
|
