[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
- To: "cbullard@hiwaay.net" <"Len Bullard"@mail.HiWAAY.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2000 19:38:19 -0800
Len Bullard wrote:
>
> Dave Winer wrote:
>
> > We've done an evaluation of SVG, and are very very excited about it.
>
> Ummm.... cool, but not killer app. This is the Goldfarb/Chamberlain
> paper finally implemented and well done. I like it. OTOH, 2D is a
> degenerate case of 3D so this is on a collision course with X3D.
That's a troll, right?
I thought it was pretty well recognized that 2D was enough simpler
than 3D that it didn't work that way. Collisions don't happen, the
two are on different roads. Most people don't _want_ the headaches
that come up in 3D modeling.
Frankly, http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG/ sure looks enough for me to use!
- Dave
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/threads.html
***************************************************************************
|
