OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help



   Re: The RDF model *is* part of the problem

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • From: Stefan Haustein <haustein@kimo.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
  • To: james.anderson@mecomnet.de
  • Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2000 13:49:10 +0100

james anderson wrote:
> while it is correct, that, in oop, the scope and extent of property
> bindings relate to object boundaries and relations, the identity of the
> name is not necessarily qualified by the class. there are other oop
> forms for which the expressiveness of rdf is necessary. java is not the
> only possibility.

You are probably talking about all the OOP forms where also 
the type / element distinction in XML Schema makes sense. :-)

> the "work-around" of "additional" namespaces is, well, the nature of the
> namespaces which java, in particular, prescribes. if rdf were to enforce
> these restrictions itself, then other oop forms wouldn't be serializable
> at all.

Can you give a relevant example of this kind of OOP? 

Best regards


Stefan Haustein
University of Dortmund
Computer Science VIII

This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/


News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS