[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "David Brownell" <david-b@pacbell.net>
- To: "KAZUMI Saito" <ksaito@flab.fujitsu.co.jp>, <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2000 06:51:20 -0700
> The test ID invalid--001 in the oasis XML Processor Conformance test requests
> notifing the violation of Validity Constraint: Proper Declaration/PE Nesting in
> section 2.8 .
>
> 001.ent:
> <!ELEMENT doc EMPTY>
> <!ENTITY % e "<!--">
> %e; -->
>
> 001.xml:
> <!DOCTYPE doc SYSTEM "001.ent">
> <doc></doc>
>
> Isn't this error fatal?
Nope, all it violates is a validity constraint so it would
by definition not be a well formedness error.
> Because XML 1.0 section 4.3.2 last 2 paragraphs says "all internal parameter
> entities are properly nested", I think.
4.3.2 says that "by definition" internal PEs are well formed, so the
definition of "%e;" is fine. It's the use on the next line that
violates the VC in 2.8 ...
- Dave
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|