[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Toby Speight <streapadair@gmx.net>
- To: "XML developers' list" <xml-dev@xml.org>
- Date: 02 May 2000 17:39:57 +0100
Peter> Peter Murray-Rust <URL:mailto:peter@ursus.demon.co.uk>
0> In article <E12mNIr-0003mH-0K@tele-post-20.mail.demon.net>, Peter
0> wrote:
Peter> On occasions in the past I and other members of the list have
Peter> urged that replies be only to the list unless requested. This
Peter> saves a poster getting two identical replies to a message.
Peter>
Peter> Is this something that people still care about?
Yes. As with newsgroups, it's annoying to send a personal reply to
something in one's personal mail, only to discover later when reading
the list that it was also sent there.
[While we're on etiquette, can I moan about people who start new
topics in the middle of existing threads? Messages with completely
irrelevant In-Reply-To or References headers often get junked along
with their containing thread when people do this. I'm not writing
this in response to any particular example; it's something that's
bugged me for ages but I didn't want to start a new thread for ;)]
--
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
