[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: Andrew Cassin <acassin@cs.mu.oz.au>
- To: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 11:51:57 +1000
On Mon, 29 May 2000 10:37:02 David Megginson wrote:
> I'm actually posting this as a cautionary tale, because Tim arrives
> unprepared and gets badly whumped in the debate (at least, it looks
that
> way reading the transcript; it's probably even worse in the RealAudio
> version).
The audio version is no better. Tod draws a line in the sand between the
PTO's responsibility and the responsibilities of US congress and is
very
effective in getting the point across.
> If we're going to carry on this debate in any meaningful way,
> we're going to have to come much better prepared, and this debate
shows
> very clearly where we need to collect a lot of good, credible
evidence
> to back up our claims.
Indeed. And this material must be sent to the US patent
office by the truck load :-/ how will the software industry fund such
prior-art
challenges and lodgements?
Andrew Cassin
acassin@cs.mu.oz.au
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
