[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
- To: xml-dev@xml.org
- Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 03:35:23 EDT
Amelia Lewis wrote:
> If you care to look at it, it's at:
> http://www.mindspring.com/~alicorn/xslv/xslv.html
>
> This includes some modifications, as well as an alternate vocabulary
> based on CSS2, and perhaps a slightly more cogent explanation of how
> it's to work. It still isn't fleshed out much, sorry. More later, if
> it looks like a remotely reasonable thing to invest time in.
Amy,
I like your idea. I think there is a need for something simpler than XSL:FO
is likely to be.
That is not to say that XSL:FO should be discarded. Arguing by analogy, not
everyone needs an 18 wheeler to take their shopping home, something a little
more modest will meet the needs of many. The majority may have neither the
need nor resources to incur the capital and maintenance costs of the "all
encompassing" solution - which is what I guess XSL:FO, in a sense, will be.
Of the three definitions you suggest for XSLV I would favour the first: "XML
Stylesheet Layout Vocabulary". I think your third suggested name could be
safely discarded without loss to humankind. :)
As I was scanning your revised suggestion the thought popped into my mind,
why not just "translate" CSS into an XML-conformant version, maybe called
"XCSS", by analogy with the recently announced XHTML Recommendation. And a
few lines later I found your link to the "XCSS" namespace.
The concept of XCSS is something which I would guess must be (or should be)
on the W3C agenda. Does anybody know? Or, could it be that the XSL:FO focus
makes "XCSS" - or XSLV - a politically highly sensitive issue?
XSL:FO, if approved, will undoubtedly be a powerful solution. But it may well
not be a manageable solution for "the little guy". Something like XSLV or
XCSS may well have a place, perhaps in certain respects similar to the way
SAX has found a place as a practical solution to a practical problem, while
not being an official W3C standard.
It will be interesting to hear further discussion on your proposal.
Andrew Watt
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: xslv updated
- From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
|