[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- To: xml-dev@XML.ORG
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2000 08:13:48 -0500
The first solution is weak and presupposes a
web application semantic. The second is weak and
presupposes local application semantics.
Hmm. Notations I guess.
Len Bullard
Intergraph Public Safety
clbullar@ingr.com
http://fly.hiwaay.net/~cbullard/lensongs.ram
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
-----Original Message-----
From: Curt Arnold [mailto:carnold@houston.rr.com]
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2000 9:52 PM
To: xml-dev@xml.org
Subject: RE: General fields
> When creating a schema (in this case, XDR) what is
> the best way to denote a so-called, General field?
> Using Visual FoxPro, this is defined to contain
> images, sounds, etc. typically OLE objects.
I would either use an element with an href to an external resource, like
<image href="logo.jpg"/>
Or if it has to be in the document, something like

***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
***************************************************************************
This is xml-dev, the mailing list for XML developers.
To unsubscribe, mailto:majordomo@xml.org&BODY=unsubscribe%20xml-dev
List archives are available at http://xml.org/archives/xml-dev/
***************************************************************************
|
