[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2000 09:14:47 -0400
At 02:23 AM 7/31/00 -0400, John Cowan wrote:
>The main argument is that they don't play well with compound documents,
>because they are outside the regular element tree structure. As such,
>they are considered hacks.
Drop the passive voice. Who considers them hacks?
(The Common XML folks consider them risky for other reasons, but I haven't
heard anyone calling them hacks on SML-DEV, so I'd look elsewhere.)
Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
|
