OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

 


 

   Re: Why not canonical parsers? [Was: Pull-based XML parsers? ]

[ Lists Home | Date Index | Thread Index ]
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
  • To: "xml-dev@lists.xml.org" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
  • Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 10:31:58 -0500

At 04:18 PM 11/10/00 +0100, Miloslav Nic wrote:
>So I can use all XML features (as an author) and just before publishing 
>push it through a "canonicator" if I want to be sure not to have some
>problems


And maybe if that takes off, we can have Canonical XML parsers which only
read Canonical XML.

Thoughts?
Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
XHTML: Migrating Toward XML
http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books




 

News | XML in Industry | Calendar | XML Registry
Marketplace | Resources | MyXML.org | Sponsors | Privacy Statement

Copyright 2001 XML.org. This site is hosted by OASIS