[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
- To: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>,"Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 00:18:25 +0000
> yield something containing lots of human-readable explanatory
> text, plus pointers to lots of different machine-readable related
> resources, but I've been saying this for 2 years now and don't
> seem to be winning the argument.
Maybe because that would still involve having a universally recognized
syntax for something that has prose descriptions and links to two machine
readable versions. What's the point of having links to two machine readable
versions if a machine can't find them! And the wheel rolls on...
Kindest Regards,
Sean B. Palmer
http://infomesh.net/sbp/
http://www.w3.org/WAI/ [ERT/GL/PF]
"Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics."
- Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.
|
