[
Lists Home |
Date Index |
Thread Index
]
- From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- To: "'xml-dev@lists.xml.org'" <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>
- Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2000 14:49:01 -0500
At 11:35 AM 12/31/00 -0800, Tim Bray wrote:
>At 05:16 PM 30/12/00 -0500, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>>Sounds good. I've got a slightly lighter suggestion. The document at the
>>namespace URI could be any well-formed XML, but the only content in it
>>which matters for purposes of automated processing is simple XLinks.
>
>Hm... I'd like to force some aspects of HTML down their throats
>to make it clear that it's an expectation that there be some
>human-readable documentation. -Tim
Fair enough, and I'm utterly sympathetic to that expectation. I'm just
pondering how to make this play somewhat nice with the schema-at-the-URI
approach Rick Jelliffe notes as being in the field already.
Maybe XHTML inside of an xsd:documentation element, or links inside the
appInfo... too many possibilities, none necessarily incompatible.
Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
XHTML: Migrating Toward XML
http://www.simonstl.com - XML essays and books
|
