[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?
- From: "Sean B. Palmer" <email@example.com>
- To: Uche Ogbuji <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Jan 2001 17:34:22 +0000
> Again, I think that the existing proposals govern the remote
> data format, and that this should be separated from
> implementation within processors.
I agree. However, as none of the proposals define methods for
implementations, and no doubt will not at any time do so, I believe that
the development of them can continue unhampered.
Looking at the XHTML Modularization specification, it appears we are
producing an "XHTML Integration Set" here.
Sean B. Palmer
"Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics."
- Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.