Mail Index

• Thread Index

• Re: XML Catalog proposal
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• RE: Semantic Web Hackings
  • From: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>
• Re: Semantic Web Hackings
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• Re: XML Catalog proposal
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• RE: Semantic Web Hackings
  • From: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>
• Re: Semantic Web Hackings
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• Re: Semantic Web Hackings
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• RE: data smushing
  • From: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>
• Re: Semantic Web Hackings
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• RE: Semantic Web Hackings
  • From: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>
• Re: Semantic Web Hackings
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• Re: XML Catalog proposal
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• XNRL
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• Re: Semantic Web Hackings
  • From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
• RE: Semantic Web Hackings
  • From: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>
• re: Namespace Basic Principles
  • From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
• Dereferencing Namespace URIs considered harmful
  • From: John Wilson <tug@wilson.co.uk>
• Re: Dereferencing Namespace URIs considered harmful
  • From: Sean McGrath <sean@digitome.com>
• Re: XNRL
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• Plan A + Plan B = Plan C?
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• Re: XNRL
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• Re: Dereferencing Namespace URIs considered harmful
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• RE: Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• XML Display in IE5/Netscape - Urgent
  • From: Dev Tuli <dev_tuli@hotmail.com>
• XML Namespace Catalog proposal 2nd edition
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: Semantic Web Hackings
  • From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
• Re: XML Display in IE5/Netscape - Urgent
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• RE: XNRL
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: XML Namespace Catalog proposal 2nd edition
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• RE: Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• Namespace Catalogue Hackery (long, mostly code)
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Plan B+1 = Plan C+1
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• RE: Namespace Catalogue Hackery (long, mostly code)
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• RE: Plan B+1 = Plan C+1
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: Plan B+1 = Plan C+1
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• Re: Plan B+1 = Plan C+1
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• RE: Plan B+1 = Plan C+1
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• questions re WD-xml-infoset-20001220
  • From: james anderson <james.anderson@attglobal.net>
• the questions remains [was Re: Begging the Question
  • From: james anderson <james.anderson@attglobal.net>
• Odd timing of XML-DEV mail
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• RE: questions re WD-xml-infoset-20001220
  • From: Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com
• RE: questions re WD-xml-infoset-20001220
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: simple question on namespaces.
  • From: Arjun Ray <aray@q2.net>
• RE: Namespace Basic Principles
  • From: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@interx.com>
• RE: Web service and Semantic Web
  • From: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@interx.com>
• RE: Success factors for the Web and Semantic Web
  • From: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@interx.com>
• OffTopic (was RE: Success factors for the Web and Semantic Web)
  • From: Sean McGrath <sean@digitome.com>
• RE: A Light Rant On Ontological Commitment
  • From: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@interx.com>
• Re: the questions remains [was Re: Begging the Question
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: Plan B+1 = Plan C+1
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• RE: data smushing
  • From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
• RE: data smushing
  • From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
• Medieval Metadata (was RE: Namespace Basic Principles)
  • From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
• Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing
  • From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
• RE: Medieval Metadata (was RE: Namespace Basic Principles)
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• RE: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• Re: Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Resource discovery directory [was: XML Catalog proposal]
  • From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
• Re: simple question on namespaces.
  • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
• RE: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing
  • From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
• RE: A Light Rant On Ontological Commitment
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• RE: local, global (was various ontology, RDF, topic maps)
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing
  • From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@clarkevans.com>
• RE: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XML Catalog proposal]
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: Problem w/ Schema for elements with similar defs
  • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@earthlink.net>
• Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XML Catalogproposal]]
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Making Resource Glosses Real (i.e. -> xml.org)
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• RE: XML vs HTTP
  • From: Mike Brown <mbrown@corp.webb.net>
• Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XMLCatalog proposal]]
  • From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
• Re: Making Resource Glosses Real (i.e. -> xml.org)
  • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
• Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XMLCatalog proposal]]
  • From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
• Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XMLCatalog proposal]]
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XMLCatalog proposal]]
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was:XMLCatalog proposal]]
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was:XMLCatalog proposal]]
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XMLCatalog proposal]]
  • From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
• Re: Resource gloss
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• RE: What is XP?
  • From: "Eve L. Maler" <eve.maler@east.sun.com>
• XML representation of grammers?
  • From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@clarkevans.com>
• XML Namespace Gloss: Proposal
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• Re: XML representation of grammers?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: XLang
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was:XMLCatalog proposal]]
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: Resource gloss
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Namespace or document gloss?
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• RE: Treaty of Wulai
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: Resource gloss
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: Resource gloss
  • From: Sean McGrath <sean@digitome.com>
• RE: Resource gloss
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• Re: Resource gloss
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• RE: Web service and Semantic Web
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: Namespace or document gloss?
  • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@usefulinc.com>
• Re: Namespace or document gloss?
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• RE: Namespace or document gloss?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: Namespace or document gloss?
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@earthlink.net>
• RE: Namespace or document gloss?
  • From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
• RE: Namespace or document gloss?
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• Newbie in the room
  • From: Richard Wrightsman <RichardWr@price.com>
• Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
  • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@usefulinc.com>
• RE: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
• RE: Related resources
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Transfering XML Documents Using HTTP Post - Objects vs text <or> myenvironment or yours
  • From: Jerry Murray <Jmurray@Ironplanet.com>
• Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: What is XP?
  • From: RENOUPREZ Jean-Luc <jean-luc.renouprez@swift.com>
• RE: data smushing
  • From: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@interx.com>
• RE: data smushing
  • From: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@interx.com>
• RE: Problem w/ Schema for elements with similar defs
  • From: =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas <jmbeas@telenium.es>
• Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL)
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: Problem w/ Schema for elements with similar defs
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• RE: A Light Rant On Ontological Commitment
  • From: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@interx.com>
• xml editor for unix platform
  • From: Sean Kim <sean.kim@prodigy.net>
• RE: Web service and Semantic Web
  • From: URAMOTO Naohiko <uramoto@trl.ibm.co.jp>
• XML document generation?
  • From: ssiddiqui <ssiddiqui@marketaxess.com>
• RE: Problem w/ Schema for elements with similar defs
  • From: =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas <jmbeas@telenium.es>
• RE: XML document generation?
  • From: "Fabio Arciniegas A." <faa@speakeasy.org>
• Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: xml editor for unix platform
  • From: Dave Winer <dave@userland.com>
• RE: Web service and Semantic Web
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Any language to GUI from XML db?
  • From: =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas <jmbeas@telenium.es>
• RE: Web service and Semantic Web
  • From: URAMOTO Naohiko <uramoto@trl.ibm.co.jp>
• RE: Web service and Semantic Web
  • From: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@interx.com>
• RE: A Light Rant On Ontological Commitment
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: Any language to GUI from XML db?
  • From: =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas <jmbeas@telenium.es>
• RE: A Light Rant On Ontological Commitment
  • From: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@interx.com>
• RE: A Light Rant On Ontological Commitment
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
  • From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
• RE: Newbie in the room
  • From: Richard Wrightsman <RichardWr@price.com>
• Re: Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL)
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: data smushing
  • From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
• Re: xml editor for unix platform
  • From: Bob Kline <bkline@rksystems.com>
• Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• vb vs java and future with XML
  • From: "e.e" <ersin.e@home.com>
• Re: Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL)
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@earthlink.net>
• Minor tragicomedy of errors
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL)
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• RE: Transfering XML Documents Using HTTP Post - Objects vs text <or>myenvironment or yours
  • From: Evan Lenz <elenz@xyzfind.com>
• Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
• RE: vb vs java and future with XML
  • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com>
• .Net vs java and future with XML
  • From: "e.e" <ersin.e@home.com>
• RE: Transfering XML Documents Using HTTP Post - Objects vs text <or>my environment or yours
  • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
• RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL)
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL)
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• Re: Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL)
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL)
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RDDL API
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Approach to XHTML M12N in XML Schemas (was Re: Resource DirectoryDescription Language (RDDL))
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• RE: xml editor for unix platform
  • From: Linda van den Brink <lvdbrink@baan.nl>
• Spanish list?
  • From: =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas <jmbeas@telenium.es>
• Re: Spanish list?
  • From: Jose Luis Sierra Rodriguez <jlsierra@sip.ucm.es>
• RE: Spanish list?
  • From: =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas <jmbeas@telenium.es>
• XML Protocol Requirements Document Published
  • From: Martin Gudgin <marting@develop.com>
• RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@mediaone.net>
• XML from VB
  • From: RamMohan <rammohanpv@aztec.soft.net>
• RE: XML from VB
  • From: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
• RE: XML from VB
  • From: Ben Sarsgard <BSarsgard@Versient.com>
• RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: [xml-doc] [ANN] XSLTUK conference, April 2001 (
  • From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
• Re: [xml-doc] [ANN] XSLTUK conference, April 2001 (
  • From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
• [ANN] XSLTUK conference, April 2001 (latest)
  • From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
• Re: Not authorized to submit to elist: xml-dev
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• Re: Approach to XHTML M12N in XML Schemas (was Re: ResourceDirectoryDescription Language (RDDL))
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• matching
  • From: "e.e" <ersin.e@home.com>
• Re: matching
  • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
• Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• RE: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com
• RE: RDDL API
  • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com>
• Re: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• RE: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: Steve Boyce <SteveB@hbs.com>
• [Zvon] VoiceXML Reference
  • From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@idoox.com>
• RE: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• Re: simple question on namespaces
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• RE: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• RE: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
• RE: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
• RE: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
• RE: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• schemas: can I restrict an elem's content based on att value?
  • From: Imran Rashid <imranr@wolfram.com>
• RE: schemas: can I restrict an elem's content based on att value?
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@earthlink.net>
• RE: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
• RE: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@mediaone.net>
• [Zvon] Zvon Character Reference
  • From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@idoox.com>
• RE: RDDL API
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• RE: matching
  • From: Ruan Malan <ruan@RUBICO.COM>
• help needed
  • From: Jerry Johns <Jjohns@computerlogic.com>
• RE: help needed
  • From: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
• Re: layers of options in XML processing
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: Problem w/ Schema for elements with similar defs
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
• Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• RE: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: Curt Arnold <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• open source tool
  • From: Vicky Papaioannou <vickyp@iti.gr>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: Curt Arnold <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• XSLT's Template Dispatch
  • From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@clarkevans.com>
• Re: open source tool
  • From: Justin Buist <jbuist@tridenttechnology.com>
• Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@mediaone.net>
• Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• XSLT: beyond a transformation tool for XML documents
  • From: Jose Luis Sierra Rodriguez <jlsierra@sip.ucm.es>
• Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
• And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: schemas: can I restrict an elem's content based on att value?
  • From: Imran Rashid <imranr@wolfram.com>
• RE: schemas: can I restrict an elem's content based on att value?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: schemas: can I restrict an elem's content based on att value?
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• RE: schemas: can I restrict an elem's content based on att value
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• RE: RDDL API
  • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com>
• RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com>
• RE: open source tool
  • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com>
• RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com>
• binary base64 definition
  • From: Jerry Johns <Jjohns@computerlogic.com>
• RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
• RE: binary base64 definition
  • From: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
• Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
• Re: binary base64 definition
  • From: Dan Vint <dvint@slip.net>
• RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com>
• [ANN] Keynotes, workshops, and classes at XML DevCon Spring 2001 (NewYork City, April 8-11)
  • From: Ken North <ken_north@compuserve.com>
• RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• What Schema can do what DTD can't
  • From: Dream Catcher <isc70409@leonis.nus.edu.sg>
• Unsuccessful attempts at validating xsd:any
  • From: Ryan Dewell <rdewell@regnow.com>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: Unsuccessful attempts at validating xsd:any
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: binary base64 definition
  • From: Ian Graham <igraham@ic-unix.ic.utoronto.ca>
• XRay XSLT/XML editor
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• [RDDL] http://www.rddl.org
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• [RDDL] Java API
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Cobol Copybooks to XML
  • From: Michael.Rohde@in-gruppe.de
• Re: XRay XSLT/XML editor
  • From: Chuck White <chuckwh@pacbell.net>
• Re: XRay XSLT/XML editor
  • From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
• RE: binary base64 definition
  • From: Jerry Johns <Jjohns@computerlogic.com>
• RE: binary base64 definition
  • From: Danny Vint <dvint@slip.net>
• RE: binary base64 definition
  • From: Ian Graham <igraham@ic-unix.ic.utoronto.ca>
• RE: binary base64 definition
  • From: Jerry Johns <Jjohns@computerlogic.com>
• RE: binary base64 definition
  • From: Danny Vint <dvint@slip.net>
• RE: binary base64 definition
  • From: Ian Graham <igraham@ic-unix.ic.utoronto.ca>
• jEdit for XML (was Re: XRay XSLT/XML editor)
  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
• Re: binary base64 definition
  • From: Amy Lewis <amyzing@talsever.com>
• RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: Begging the Question
  • From: "Paul W. Abrahams" <abrahams@valinet.com>
• Quick edit
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• RE: Quick edit
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• [ANN] IdooXoap with EJB; preconfigured Tomcat
  • From: Jacek Kopecky <jacek@idoox.com>
• RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@mediaone.net>
• Unprefixed attribute names in RDF
  • From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
• RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Danny Vint <dvint@slip.net>
• RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Danny Vint <dvint@slip.net>
• Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable)
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• Re: Unprefixed attribute names in RDF
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• RE: Quick edit
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: RDDL API
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: Unprefixed attribute names in RDF
  • From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
• RE: Why doesn't this solve this namepaces problem?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: Unprefixed attribute names in RDF
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• Re: Problem w/ Schema for elements with similar defs
  • From: Eddie Robertsson <eddie@allette.com.au>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: Eddie Robertsson <eddie@allette.com.au>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
• RE: Cobol Copybooks to XML
  • From: Ruan Malan <ruan@RUBICO.COM>
• Re: Cobol Copybooks to XML
  • From: Michael.Rohde@in-gruppe.de
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
• XPath: how to select based on element type?
  • From: Sankaranarayanan K V <sankar@migv.mot.com>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: XPath: how to select based on element type?
  • From: Matt Sergeant <matt@sergeant.org>
• Re: Quick edit
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: XPath: how to select based on element type?
  • From: Sankaranarayanan K V <sankar@migv.mot.com>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
• Re: XPath: how to select based on element type?
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• SAX2 bugs???
  • From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
• Re: XPath: how to select based on element type?
  • From: Matt Sergeant <matt@sergeant.org>
• Re: Unprefixed attribute names in RDF
  • From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
• Re: XPath: how to select based on element type?
  • From: Sankaranarayanan K V <sankar@migv.mot.com>
• TREX - a new schema language
  • From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• [ANN]: SIX
  • From: Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com>
• Predicate Logic in XML (was Re: [ANN]: SIX)
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: Predicate Logic in XML (was Re: [ANN]: SIX)
  • From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
• RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
• Re: [ANN]: SIX)
  • From: Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com>
• RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Dan Vint <dvint@slip.net>
• RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Deadline for papers for XML Europe 2001 extended till Friday 13 January
  • From: "Elledge, Marion" <melledge@printing.org>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Silly XML statistic
  • From: "Steven J. DeRose" <Steven_DeRose@brown.edu>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@earthlink.net>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
• RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
• RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing
  • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
• Re: Global Attributes Not Covered by the XML Specification?
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Dan Vint <dvint@slip.net>
• RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices (touches XHTML modularization als o)
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• RE: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• Q: How to create DTD from relational database?
  • From: Brian Miller <brian_n_miller@yahoo.com>
• URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• What is happened with Balise?
  • From: "Oleg A. Paraschenko" <prof@infosite.ru>
• RE: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
  • From: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>
• RE: XHTML m12n XSD
  • From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism@lexica.net>
• Re: What is happened with Balise?
  • From: Heinz.Wittenbrink@t-online.de (Heinz Wittenbrink)
• RE: What is happened with Balise?
  • From: Linda van den Brink <lvdbrink@baan.nl>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices (touches XHTML modularization als o)
  • From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Caroline Clewlow <cclewlow@eris.dera.gov.uk>
• [Zvon] MathML 2 Reference updated to reflect Proposed Recommendation
  • From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@idoox.com>
• Re: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• RE: [ANN]: SIX
  • From: Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
• Re: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing
  • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
• Re: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing
  • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
• [OT?] Your opinion please
  • From: ":-Koshy Kerteya-:" <koshy@mbox3.singnet.com.sg>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Bob Kline <bkline@rksystems.com>
• XSL Help
  • From: "Kumar V." <vkumar@techbooks.com>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Caroline Clewlow <cclewlow@eris.dera.gov.uk>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
• Re: XSL Help
  • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
• [Zvon] XML Schema Reference
  • From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@idoox.com>
• RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices (touches XHTML modularization als o)
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
• Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• RE: What is happened with Balise?
  • From: Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: "Eve L. Maler" <eve.maler@east.sun.com>
• RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Ben Trafford <ben@legendary.org>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
• Script model
  • From: Richard Schreier <rschreier@coast.com>
• RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
• Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• RE: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
  • From: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>
• RE: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Article on RDF and Natural Language Processing
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• RE: Script model
  • From: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@interx.com>
• Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
  • From: John Aldridge <john.aldridge@informatix.co.uk>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>
• Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Multiple rules in RELAX (was Re: And the DTD says...)
  • From: Murata Makoto <mura034@attglobal.net>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
• XML-RPC for C and C++
  • From: Dave Winer <dave@userland.com>
• XML Presentations available
  • From: "David E. Cleary" <davec@progress.com>
• XML & Database
  • From: Natarajan Karthikeyan <karthik@adone.com>
• RE: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
  • From: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>
• Re: XML & Database
  • From: Steve Muench <smuench@us.oracle.com>
• xml 2 postscript
  • From: "Pollington, Lee (ELSLON)" <lee.pollington@biomednet.com>
• RDDL: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatch on related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: xml 2 postscript
  • From: David Tolpin <dvd@hragir.aua.am>
• RDDL: Namespace URIs as document types. was Re: URIs,names and well known RDDL names
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: XML & Database
  • From: Jerry Murray <Jmurray@Ironplanet.com>
• Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• DTD and Illegal Construct
  • From: Jim Shain <Jim.Shain@alltel.com>
• Re: RDDL: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatch on related resources?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: DTD and Illegal Construct
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Fw: RDDL: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatch on related resources?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: DTD and Illegal Construct
  • From: Dan Vint <dvint@slip.net>
• Re: DTD and Illegal Construct
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• RE: DTD and Illegal Construct
  • From: "Dudley, Mark" <Mark.Dudley@usa.xerox.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Fw: RDDL: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatch on related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: DTD and Illegal Construct
  • From: Jim Shain <Jim.Shain@alltel.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: DTD and Illegal Construct
  • From: Jim Shain <Jim.Shain@alltel.com>
• RE: DTD and Illegal Construct
  • From: "Gregory M. Messner" <greg.messner@breezefactor.com>
• RE: DTD and Illegal Construct
  • From: Xan Gregg <xan@tibco.com>
• Re: DTD and Illegal Construct
  • From: Dan Vint <dvint@slip.net>
• Re: DTD and Illegal Construct
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Re: DTD and Illegal Construct
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• RE: DTD and Illegal Construct
  • From: Jim Shain <Jim.Shain@alltel.com>
• RE: DTD and Illegal Construct
  • From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
• Announce: The RSL Project (Reticular Structure Layer | Language)
  • From: Paul Cody Johnston <pcj@stanford.edu>
• RE: DTD and Illegal Construct
  • From: Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre <dalapeyre@mulberrytech.com>
• Re: DTD and Illegal Construct
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Re: DTD and Illegal Construct
  • From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
• Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way to dispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
• Re: DTD and Illegal Construct
  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
• RE: RDDL: Namespace URIs as document types. was Re: URIs,names and well known RDDL names
  • From: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>
• RE: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way to dispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
  • From: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>
• Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way to dispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
• Schema localization? *Newbie alert*
  • From: "Vegt, Jan" <Jan.Vegt@softwareag.com>
• Re: Schema localization? *Newbie alert*
  • From: Bob DuCharme <bob@udico.com>
• RE: RDDL: Namespace URIs as document types. was Re: URIs,names and well known RDDL names
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• More SIX
  • From: Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com>
• Re: RDDL: Namespace URIs as document types. was Re: URIs,names andwell known RDDL names
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
• RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
• RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Of the XPointer Patent [was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0]>
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Of the XPointer Patent
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
• Re: XML & Database
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: Of the XPointer Patent [was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer1.0]>
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
• XML Tools for Linux & Unix
  • From: Bill <bill@bluespark.com>
• Aelfred2 Problem
  • From: "Scerri, Antony (ELSLON)" <antony.scerri@biomednet.com>
• Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• How compatible are XML Schema implementations?
  • From: Jonathan Robie <Jonathan.Robie@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: RDDL: Namespace URIs as document types. was Re: URIs,names and well known RDDL names
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
• RE: Schema localization? *Newbie alert*
  • From: johns@syscore.com (John F. Schlesinger)
• RE: How compatible are XML Schema implementations?
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• URI references and UTF-8 based escaping
  • From: Mike Brown <mbrown@corp.webb.net>
• RE: How compatible are XML Schema implementations?
  • From: johns@syscore.com (John F. Schlesinger)
• Re: How compatible are XML Schema implementations?
  • From: Jonathan Robie <Jonathan.Robie@SoftwareAG-USA.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• [ANN] Updated version of DTD to XML Schema tool
  • From: Mary Holstege <holstege@mathling.com>
• RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• XPointer and Sun patent
  • From: "Paul W. Abrahams" <abrahams@valinet.com>
• white hat patents?
  • From: da - dan ancona <da@vizbang.com>
• Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Fighting Software Patents
  • From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
• Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
• Re: Fighting Software Patents
  • From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@qub.com>
• RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Arjun Ray <aray@q2.net>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: XPointer and Sun patent
  • From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@qub.com>
• Lawyers. Re: XPointer and Sun patent
  • From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@qub.com>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: Schema localization? *Newbie alert*
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• RDDL and entities (was Re: Schemas and entities (was"And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: XPointer and Sun patent
  • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
• FW: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: FW: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: John Aldridge <john.aldridge@informatix.co.uk>
• Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way to dispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
• Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• RE: white hat patents?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
• Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
• Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0)
  • From: Dave Winer <dave@userland.com>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Turning off validation (was Re: Schemas and entities)
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: Turning off validation (was Re: Schemas and entities)
  • From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
• Re: Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0)
  • From: Dave Winer <dave@userland.com>
• Re: Turning off validation (was Re: Schemas and entities)
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Re: Lawyers. Re: XPointer and Sun patent
  • From: Bob DuCharme <bob@udico.com>
• Re: Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0)
  • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@usefulinc.com>
• Re: Turning off validation (was Re: Schemas and entities)
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• convert XML to Canonical XML
  • From: Alexander Nakhimovsky <sasha@cs.colgate.edu>
• RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
• Re: Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0)
  • From: Dave Winer <dave@userland.com>
• Re: Turning off validation (was Re: Schemas and entities)
  • From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
• RE: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
  • From: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>
• Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• Catalogs: another angle
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0 <offtopic>
  • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@earthlink.net>
• RE: Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1 .0)
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0 <offtopic>
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Generate Samples from Schemas
  • From: Michael.Rohde@in-gruppe.de
• Re: Lawyers. Re: XPointer and Sun patent
  • From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@qub.com>
• RDDL and Schema Localization
  • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@earthlink.net>
• Re: Generate Samples from Schemas
  • From: Dan Vint <dvint@slip.net>
• Standard RDDL processing order or ALL?
  • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@earthlink.net>
• Re: RDDL and Schema Localization
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: Standard RDDL processing order or ALL?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: Catalogs: another angle
  • From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
• Announce: Updated DocBook Schemas
  • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
• Re: Announce: Updated DocBook Schemas
  • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
• RE: convert XML to Canonical XML
  • From: Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net>
• ANNOUNCE: XML Spy 3.5 Beta 4 available for download
  • From: XML Spy <xml-dev@xmlspy.com>
• Transforming an XML Document into another
  • From: Newsha Makooi <Newsha@imrgold.com>
• a simple question
  • From: George Fang <fang_george@hotmail.com>
• Re: Of the XPointer Patent
  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
• RE: RDDL and Schema Localization
  • From: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>
• RDDL requirements
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: RDDL and Schema Localization
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• role, arcrole, purpose, nature
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• RE: RDDL requirements
  • From: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>
• Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: Alexey Gokhberg <alexei@bluewin.ch>
• Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
• Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: Matt Sergeant <matt@sergeant.org>
• Re: a simple question
  • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@earthlink.net>
• Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: Alexey Gokhberg <alexei@bluewin.ch>
• Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: Alexey Gokhberg <alexei@bluewin.ch>
• Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
• Submit your schema and stylesheet problems
  • From: Ken North <ken_north@compuserve.com>
• Submit your schema and stylesheet problems
  • From: Ken North <ken_north@compuserve.com>
• RE: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com
• SyncML is kind of interesting
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• RE: SyncML is kind of interesting
  • From: Didier PH Martin <martind@netfolder.com>
• Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
• Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: Alexey Gokhberg <alexei@bluewin.ch>
• RE: Fighting Software Patents
  • From: Steve Boyce <SteveB@hbs.com>
• Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• RE: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com
• Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: Alexey Gokhberg <alexei@bluewin.ch>
• Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: Alexey Gokhberg <alexei@bluewin.ch>
• RE: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com
• RE: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com
• Language politics and DOM bindings
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• difference
  • From: ersin <ersin.e@home.com>
• should all XML parsers reject non-deterministic content models?
  • From: "TAKAHASHI Hideo(BSD-13G)" <hideo-t@bisd.hitachi.co.jp>
• Re: should all XML parsers reject non-deterministic content models?
  • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
• Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: Alexey Gokhberg <alexei@bluewin.ch>
• Re: should all XML parsers reject non-deterministic content models?
  • From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
• Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: Alexey Gokhberg <alexei@bluewin.ch>
• Re: should all XML parsers reject non-deterministic content models?
  • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
• RDDL draft 20010114
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• SVGSpider.com - the world's "first" all SVG web site?
  • From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
• Re: should all XML parsers reject non-deterministic content models?
  • From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
• RE: should all XML parsers reject non-deterministic content models?
  • From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
• Re: RDDL draft 20010114
  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
• Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent)
  • From: Anatole Tartakovsky <anatolet@teamcti.com>
• RE: SVGSpider.com - the world's "first" all SVG web site?
  • From: Didier PH Martin <martind@netfolder.com>
• Re: RDDL draft 20010114
  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
• RE: RDDL draft 20010114
  • From: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>
• Re: SVGSpider.com - the world's "first" all SVG web site?
  • From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
• Re: DTD and Illegal Construct
  • From: Robin Cover <robin@isogen.com>
• Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!")
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• RDDL.NET 2001-01-14
  • From: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>
• Re: Language politics and DOM bindings
  • From: Lauren Wood <lauren@sqwest.bc.ca>
• Re: should all XML parsers reject non-deterministic content models?
  • From: "TAKAHASHI Hideo(BSD-13G)" <hideo-t@bisd.hitachi.co.jp>
• RE: RDDL.NET 2001-01-14
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• One XSL for two XML document
  • From: Dream Catcher <isc70409@leonis.nus.edu.sg>
• One XSL for two XML document
  • From: Dream Catcher <isc70409@leonis.nus.edu.sg>
• RE: One XSL for two XML document
  • From: Jason Diamond <jason@injektilo.org>
• TREX update
  • From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
• RE: TREX update
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: Language politics and DOM bindings
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: TREX update
  • From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
• Excel to XML
  • From: =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas <jmbeas@telenium.es>
• RE: RDDL and Schema Localization
  • From: "Vegt, Jan" <Jan.Vegt@softwareag.com>
• Re: Excel to XML
  • From: Matt Sergeant <matt@sergeant.org>
• DTD to W3C schema file?
  • From: Giota Karadimitriou <karadim@iti.gr>
• Re: DTD to W3C schema file?
  • From: Robin Berjon <robin@knowscape.com>
• RE: Excel to XML
  • From: =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas <jmbeas@telenium.es>
• Re: Excel to XML
  • From: Jeff Veit <jeff.veit@tanasity.com>
• RE: Transforming an XML Document into another
  • From: Mike Brown <mbrown@corp.webb.net>
• Re: Excel to XML
  • From: Anatole Tartakovsky <anatolet@teamcti.com>
• RDDL 2 RSS
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Referring to external DTD's
  • From: RamMohan <rammohanpv@aztec.soft.net>
• RE: Referring to external DTD's
  • From: Mike Brown <mbrown@corp.webb.net>
• Dynamic call template
  • From: Pietro Venanzangeli <venanzangeli@sigma.it>
• Re: Excel to XML
  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
• Re: XPointer and Sun patent
  • From: "Paul W. Abrahams" <abrahams@valinet.com>
• RE: Excel to XML
  • From: Evan Lenz <elenz@xyzfind.com>
• Push Technologies
  • From: "Manos M. Batsis" <manosb@profile.gr>
• Re: XPointer and Sun patent
  • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
• Re: Excel to XML
  • From: Richard Lanyon <rgl@decisionsoft.com>
• ANNOUNCE: eXist - xml search engine / repository
  • From: Wolfgang Meier <meier@ifs.tu-darmstadt.de>
• How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
• RE: Push Technologies
  • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• ANN: 4Suite 0.10.1
  • From: uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
• ANN: 4Suite Server 0.10.1
  • From: uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com
• Re: 4Suite Server 0.10.1
  • From: Michael Beddow <mbnospam@mbeddow.net>
• RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
• Use cases [was: How could RDDL be distributed ?]
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
• RE: Who needs and uses XML Schema key/keyref?
  • From: Charlie McCay <Charlie@RamseySystems.co.uk>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Dave Winer <dave@userland.com>
• RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• RE: DTD to W3C schema file?
  • From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
• RE: Excel to XML
  • From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
• RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Leigh Dodds <ldodds@ingenta.com>
• RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
• Re: Use cases [was: How could RDDL be distributed ?]
  • From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
• RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• Re: Use cases [was: How could RDDL be distributed ?]
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• CDATA sections
  • From: Dawn Volkman <dawn@bus.net>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• RE: Who needs and uses XML Schema key/keyref?
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Mark Baker <mark.baker@canada.sun.com>
• RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
• Publish and subscribe over the Internet
  • From: Dave Winer <dave@userland.com>
• RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: Use cases [was: How could RDDL be distributed ?]
  • From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
• Standard DTD...
  • From: Seetharam Samptur <ssamptur@gadzoox.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
• RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Mark Baker <mark.baker@canada.sun.com>
• PSGML and automatic default attributes?
  • From: Bob DuCharme <bob@udico.com>
• need info on XSLT processor
  • From: Natarajan Karthikeyan <karthik@adone.com>
• Re: need info on XSLT processor
  • From: Bob DuCharme <bob@udico.com>
• xpath axes
  • From: Adam Van Den Hoven <Adam.Hoven@bluezone.net>
• Re: xpath axes
  • From: sdyck@reveregroup.com
• Re: xpath axes
  • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
• XPointer syntax
  • From: Jeff Lansing <jeff@polexis.com>
• Re: xpath axes
  • From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
• Re: 4Suite Server 0.10.1
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: Use cases [was: How could RDDL be distributed ?]
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: PSGML and automatic default attributes?
  • From: Michael Smith <smith@xml-doc.org>
• Re: 4Suite Server 0.10.1
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: xpath axes
  • From: Adam Van Den Hoven <Adam.Hoven@bluezone.net>
• The Aftermath (was Re: 4Suite Server 0.10.1)
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• DTD Inheritance..
  • From: Seetharam Samptur <ssamptur@gadzoox.com>
• Re: DTD Inheritance..
  • From: Patrick Lightbody <plightbo@cisco.com>
• Determing DTD attributes
  • From: Patrick Lightbody <plightbo@cisco.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: James Robertson <jamesr@steptwo.com.au>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: James Robertson <jamesr@steptwo.com.au>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: James Robertson <jamesr@steptwo.com.au>
• RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: James Robertson <jamesr@steptwo.com.au>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Steve Tinney <stinney@sas.upenn.edu>
• RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: James Robertson <jamesr@steptwo.com.au>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@earthlink.net>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: Caroline Clewlow <cclewlow@eris.dera.gov.uk>
• Re: DTD Inheritance..
  • From: Caroline Clewlow <cclewlow@eris.dera.gov.uk>
• RE: The Aftermath (was Re: 4Suite Server 0.10.1)
  • From: Edmund Mitchell <EMitchell@fnf.com>
• Re: The Aftermath (was Re: 4Suite Server 0.10.1)
  • From: Lars Martin <lars@smb-tec.com>
• Re: The Aftermath (was Re: 4Suite Server 0.10.1)
  • From: Lars Martin <lars@smb-tec.com>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>
• XML application for sport content
  • From: Owen Sullivan <owen.sullivan@worldzap.com>
• XML:DB (was Re: The Aftermath)
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• [Zvon] XPath tutorial redesigned
  • From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@idoox.com>
• FW: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• RE: Dereferencing Namespace URIs considered harmful
  • From: Edwin.Fine@CommerceQuest.com
• a11n (Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?)
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: Dereferencing Namespace URIs considered harmful
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: a11n (Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?)
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• [ANN] XML Haiku competition
  • From: Paul Spencer <paul.spencer@boynings.co.uk>
• The importance of XML (2 programs in Technetcast Top 30)
  • From: Ken North <ken_north@compuserve.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
• Re: a11n [OT] (Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?)
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: Eddie Robertsson <eddie@allette.com.au>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@earthlink.net>
• Textual transmission typically faster?
  • From: Mark.Papiani@ubsw.com
• Re: Textual transmission typically faster?
  • From: Michael Beddow <mbnospam@mbeddow.net>
• Re: Textual transmission typically faster?
  • From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
• RE: Textual transmission typically faster?
  • From: Eugene Kuznetsov <eugene@datapower.com>
• XML vs HTML browser for PDA
  • From: Himanshu Kapoor <himanshu.kapoor@riverrun.com>
• Re: Textual transmission typically faster?
  • From: Caroline Clewlow <cclewlow@eris.dera.gov.uk>
• ANN: Unicorn XML Toolkit documentation preview is available
  • From: Alexey Gokhberg <alexei@bluewin.ch>
• RE: Textual transmission typically faster?
  • From: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>
• Re: Textual transmission typically faster?
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• Re: XML vs HTML browser for PDA
  • From: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
• RE: Textual transmission typically faster?
  • From: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@interx.com>
• RE: Textual transmission typically faster?
  • From: Matt Sergeant <matt@sergeant.org>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
• SVG & XPointer - When I write SVG code can I be sued?
  • From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
• Re: SVG & XPointer - When I write SVG code can I be sued?
  • From: Robin Berjon <robin@knowscape.com>
• Re: SVG & XPointer - When I write SVG code can I be sued?
  • From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@earthlink.net>
• Re: SVG & XPointer - When I write SVG code can I be sued?
  • From: Robin Berjon <robin@knowscape.com>
• Haiku
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• RE: Haiku
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: Haiku
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: Haiku
  • From: "Hodder, Ed" <Ed.Hodder@Bowne.com>
• XPointer WD 20010108 - location-set "error"?
  • From: AndrewWatt2000@aol.com
• Re: XML TO PDF
  • From: Daniel Barclay <Daniel.Barclay@digitalfocus.com>
• Re: Haiku
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• RE: Haiku
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: Place under sun
  • From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
• RE: Haiku
  • From: "Robert C. Lyons" <boblyons@unidex.com>
• having dtd in a separate file (creating xml document)
  • From: Kate Lapan <kate@Peakstone.com>
• RE: Haiku
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• CFP: O'Reilly Open Source Conference/XTech XML Track
  • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@usefulinc.com>
• Re: Haiku
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• RE: having dtd in a separate file (creating xml document)
  • From: Xan Gregg <xan@tibco.com>
• ANNOUNCE: XML Spy 3.5 released today - now available for downloading
  • From: XML Spy <xml-dev@xmlspy.com>
• RE: Haiku
  • From: "Manos M. Batsis" <manosb@profile.gr>
• Re: Haiku
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: Caroline Clewlow <cclewlow@eris.dera.gov.uk>
• RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
  • From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: Martin Bryan <mtbryan@sgml.u-net.com>
• Re: What is an XML document?
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Re: What is an XML document?
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• haiku
  • From: Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net>
• Re: What is an XML document?
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Re: What is an XML document?
  • From: Michael Beddow <mbnospam@mbeddow.net>
• RE: What is an XML document?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• XML "include"?
  • From: Patrick Lightbody <plightbo@cisco.com>
• Re: What is an XML document?
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• RE: Haiku
  • From: "Webber, Andrew" <WebbeA@parl.gc.ca>
• Re: What is an XML document?
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• How could RDDL be internationalised?
  • From: Tony Coates <Tony.Coates@reuters.com>
• RE: XML "include"?
  • From: Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net>
• RE: XML "include"?
  • From: Patrick Lightbody <plightbo@cisco.com>
• Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: Tony Coates <Tony.Coates@reuters.com>
• RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: What is an XML document?
  • From: Bob DuCharme <bob@udico.com>
• Re: How could RDDL be internationalised?
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• RE: What is an XML document?
  • From: Jerry Murray <Jmurray@Ironplanet.com>
• Re: What is an XML document?
  • From: Jeff Lansing <jeff@polexis.com>
• RE: XML "include"?
  • From: Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net>
• Re: What is an XML document?
  • From: Bob DuCharme <bob@udico.com>
• RE: What is an XML document?
  • From: Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net>
• archive search feature now available
  • From: Karl Best <karl.best@oasis-open.org>
• Re: What is an XML document?
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Re: Haiku
  • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@earthlink.net>
• RE: What is an XML document?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: XML "include"?
  • From: Ben Trafford <ben@legendary.org>
• Re: How could RDDL be internationalised?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: Haiku
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• Re: Haiku
  • From: Aura Sheffield <aura@home.com>
• Haiku
  • From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@earthlink.net>
• Haikus.
  • From: Ben Trafford <ben@legendary.org>
• Re: Haiku
  • From: Michael Beddow <mbnospam@mbeddow.net>
• Haiku (on XSLT)
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• RE: Haiku
  • From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
• Re: Textual transmission typically faster?
  • From: Paul Cody Johnston <pcj@inxar.org>
• Re: Textual transmission typically faster?
  • From: Ken North <ken_north@compuserve.com>
• why importNode error like this
  • From: Huaxin Zhang <hxzhang@cs.ualberta.ca>
• Re: Haiku
  • From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@earthlink.net>
• RE: why importNode error like this
  • From: Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com
• RE: Textual transmission typically faster?
  • From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
• Re: Haiku
  • From: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
• Re: Haikus.
  • From: Philippe Lourier <pl@technetcast.com>
• RE: why importNode error like this
  • From: Huaxin Zhang <hxzhang@cs.ualberta.ca>
• RE: why importNode error like this
  • From: Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
• RE: Haiku
  • From: John Turnbull <jturnbull@softquad.com>
• Announce: Ninth Edition of XSLT/XPath Tutorial Materials (XML-Dev List)
  • From: "G. Ken Holman" <gkholman@CraneSoftwrights.com>
• RE: Textual transmission typically faster?
  • From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@earthlink.net>
• [ANNOUNCE] AxKit 1.2
  • From: Matt Sergeant <matt@sergeant.org>
• Get expected firstchild/siblings
  • From: Patrick Lightbody <plightbo@cisco.com>
• Abbreviated Tag Names
  • From: Don Park <donpark@docuverse.com>
• RDDL spec 20010122
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: XML 1.0 - Element order significance
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• XML ad SOAP
  • From: Bovone Stefano <Stefano.Bovone@elsag.it>
• simpleType hh:mm:ss:ff
  • From: =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas <jmbeas@telenium.es>
• RE: Abbreviated Tag Names
  • From: Sam <sblackbu@erols.com>
• XML and JSP
  • From: Anu Ranjan Mishra <anuranjan.mishra@geind.ge.com>
• Re: simpleType hh:mm:ss:ff
  • From: Bob Kline <bkline@rksystems.com>
• RE: Abbreviated Tag Names
  • From: "Pollington, Lee (ELSLON)" <lee.pollington@biomednet.com>
• RE: XML 1.0 - Element order significance
  • From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
• RE: simpleType hh:mm:ss:ff
  • From: =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas <jmbeas@telenium.es>
• Re: Abbreviated Tag Names
  • From: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>
• Knowledge Technologies 2001 to address Next Revolution for the W eb---March 4-7, 2001 Austin, TX
  • From: "Elledge, Marion" <melledge@printing.org>
• Re: XML 1.0 - Element order significance
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• Re: XML 1.0 - Element order significance
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Re: Abbreviated Tag Names
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: Textual transmission typically faster?
  • From: Ken North <ken_north@compuserve.com>
• STAX Re: Abbreviated Tag Names
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• RE: XML 1.0 - Element order significance
  • From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
• ANNOUNCEMENT: Rapier RDF Parser 0.9.0
  • From: Dave Beckett <dave.beckett@bristol.ac.uk>
• RE: simpleType hh:mm:ss:ff
  • From: Bob Kline <bkline@rksystems.com>
• Re: STAX Re: Abbreviated Tag Names
  • From: Fredrik Lindgren <fredrik.lindgren@goyada.com>
• Re: XML 1.0 - Element order significance
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: simpleType hh:mm:ss:ff
  • From: Robin Cover <robin@isogen.com>
• RE: XML 1.0 - Element order significance
  • From: Mike Brown <mbrown@corp.webb.net>
• RDDL Schematron Schema
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: Abbreviated Tag Names
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: XML 1.0 - Element order significance
  • From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@earthlink.net>
• RE: XML 1.0 - Element order significance
  • From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
• ANN: Emacs WYSIWYG CALS table generator
  • From: Michael Smith <smith@xml-doc.org>
• RE: Abbreviated Tag Names
  • From: Don Park <donpark@docuverse.com>
• RE: simpleType hh:mm:ss:ff
  • From: =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas <jmbeas@telenium.es>
• RE: simpleType hh:mm:ss:ff
  • From: =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas <jmbeas@telenium.es>
• Re: simpleType hh:mm:ss:ff
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: XML 1.0 - Element order significance
  • From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
• RE: simpleType hh:mm:ss:ff
  • From: Bob Kline <bkline@rksystems.com>
• Aelfred (SAX2) Support
  • From: "Scerri, Antony (ELSLON)" <antony.scerri@biomednet.com>
• Re: Aelfred (SAX2) Support
  • From: David Brownell <david-b@pacbell.net>
• Re: XML 1.0 - Element order significance
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: XML 1.0 - Element order significance
  • From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
• Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema
  • From: Francesco Ricci <ricci@itc.it>
• RE: XML 1.0 - Element order significance
  • From: Danny Ayers <danny@panlanka.net>
• Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema
  • From: Edd Dumbill <edd@usefulinc.com>
• RE: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• Suggestions for XML editors
  • From: Jean-Marc VANEL <jmvanel@industrysuppliers.com>
• RE: Abbreviated Tag Names
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• RE: XML 1.0 - Element order significance
  • From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
• RE: Haiku
  • From: Paul Spencer <paul.spencer@boynings.co.uk>
• RE: Haiku
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: Haiku
  • From: Masoud Salehi-sedeh <MSalehi@lexica.net>
• RE: Abbreviated Tag Names
  • From: Don Park <donpark@docuverse.com>
• Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema
  • From: Ken North <ken_north@compuserve.com>
• Semantic Web Agreement Group
  • From: SWAG WG <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
• TREX to OASIS?
  • From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
• Re: Abbreviated Tag Names
  • From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@mediaone.net>
• Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema (fwd)
  • From: Andrew Goodchild <andrewg@dstc.edu.au>
• RE: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema
  • From: Jean-Marc VANEL <jmvanel@industrysuppliers.com>
• DTD attribute list syntax for referencing content
  • From: Dan Matthews <dan@grandprix.freeserve.co.uk>
• Re: DTD attribute list syntax for referencing content
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• XML DOM Obj size limitations?
  • From: Newsha Makooi <Newsha@imrgold.com>
• RE: XML DOM Obj size limitations?
  • From: Newsha Makooi <Newsha@imrgold.com>
• Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema
  • From: Robin Cover <robin@isogen.com>
• RE: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema
  • From: "Vegt, Jan" <Jan.Vegt@softwareag.com>
• Re: Suggestions for XML editors
  • From: Michael Smith <smith@xml-doc.org>
• Name Space Question
  • From: "Conrad, Bill (ThomasTech)" <bconrad@thomastechsolutions.com>
• RE: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• XML auf Deutsch?
  • From: "Fenton, Brigitte (ThomasTech)" <BFenton@thomastechsolutions.com>
• FW: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• RE: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema
  • From: "Vegt, Jan" <Jan.Vegt@softwareag.com>
• Re: XML auf Deutsch?
  • From: Michael Beddow <mbnospam@mbeddow.net>
• RE: XML DOM Object size limitations
  • From: Chris Loschen <loschen@texterity.com>
• RE: Suggestions for XML editors
  • From: Jean-Marc VANEL <jmvanel@industrysuppliers.com>
• RE: Name Space Question
  • From: Mike Brown <mbrown@corp.webb.net>
• RE: Name Space Question
  • From: Mike Brown <mbrown@corp.webb.net>
• RE: XML DOM Object size limitations
  • From: Robin LaFontaine <robin@monsell.co.uk>
• RE: XML DOM Object size limitations
  • From: Philippe LAMBERT <Philippe.LAMBERT@gemplus.com>
• Re: XML DOM Object size limitations
  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
• RE: XML DOM Object size limitations (MSDN)
  • From: Newsha Makooi <Newsha@imrgold.com>
• survey of pull-style parsers
  • From: Ken MacLeod <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us>
• Re: XML DOM Object size limitations
  • From: Anatole Tartakovsky <anatolet@teamcti.com>
• Re: How do Name Spaces relate to Schemas?
  • From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@mediaone.net>
• Proposal for new RDDL natures and purpose
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• New W3C XML Schema facet ? [was: RDDL Schematron Schema]
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• FW: SIX 1.0 Spec. Online
  • From: Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com>
• What is the nature of HTML 4.0? was RE: Proposal for new RDDL naturesand purpose
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: What is the nature of HTML 4.0? was RE: Proposal for new RDDLnaturesand purpose
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• RE: New W3C XML Schema facet ? [was: RDDL Schematron Schema]
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• What is the purpose of RDF Schema? was RE: What is the nature of HTML4.0?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: New W3C XML Schema facet ? [was: RDDL Schematron Schema]
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: What is the nature of HTML 4.0? was RE: Proposal for new RDDLnatures and purpose
  • From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
• Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema
  • From: RENOUPREZ Jean-Luc <jean-luc.renouprez@swift.com>
• Re: What is the purpose of RDF Schema? was RE: What is the nature ofHTML4.0?
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema
  • From: Robin Cover <robin@isogen.com>
• Attribute-Value Normalization problem
  • From: Jianjun Zhang <jiazhang@eecs.umich.edu>
• Re: Attribute-Value Normalization problem
  • From: Richard Tobin <richard@cogsci.ed.ac.uk>
• Re: What is the nature of HTML 4.0? was RE: Proposal for newRDDLnatures and purpose
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Schema ambiguity detection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)
  • From: "K.Kawaguchi" <k-kawa@bigfoot.com>
• Schema ambiguity detection algorithm for RELAX (3/4)
  • From: "K.Kawaguchi" <k-kawa@bigfoot.com>
• Schema ambiguity detection algorithm for RELAX (4/4)
  • From: "K.Kawaguchi" <k-kawa@bigfoot.com>
• Schema ambiguity detection algorithm for RELAX (2/4)
  • From: "K.Kawaguchi" <k-kawa@bigfoot.com>
• RE: New W3C XML Schema facet ? [was: RDDL Schematron Schema]
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• MSXML Parser version/mode installed
  • From: Newsha Makooi <Newsha@imrgold.com>
• XML and embedded systems
  • From: James Spink <jimspink@hotmail.com>
• Converting XML to ASCII
  • From: Mark McClure <Mark.McClure@sufsys.com>
• RE: Converting XML to ASCII
  • From: Mark McClure <Mark.McClure@sufsys.com>
• RE: Converting XML to ASCII
  • From: Robin Berjon <robin@knowscape.com>
• Re: Converting XML to ASCII
  • From: Christopher Martis <chris.martis@swift.com>
• urn:uuid:c2f41010-65b3-11d1-a29f-00aa00c14882/
  • From: "Cox, Roger" <Roger.Cox@netapp.com>
• Open meeting (British Computer Society and XML UK, February 22,London, )
  • From: Ken North <ken_north@compuserve.com>
• Re: Name Space Question
  • From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>
• RE: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema
  • From: Robin Cover <robin@isogen.com>
• Re: Attribute-Value Normalization problem
  • From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@mediaone.net>
• Re: urn:uuid:c2f41010-65b3-11d1-a29f-00aa00c14882/
  • From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@mediaone.net>
• Re: urn:uuid:c2f41010-65b3-11d1-a29f-00aa00c14882/
  • From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
• Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: Dereferencing Namespace URIs considered harmful
  • From: John Wilson <tug@wilson.co.uk>
• Re: XML and embedded systems
  • From: John Wilson <tug@wilson.co.uk>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Dan Brickley <Daniel.Brickley@bristol.ac.uk>
• [RDDL] Java Object Model
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schemaambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
• RE: Dereferencing Namespace URIs considered harmful
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schemaambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@clarkevans.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• RE: What is the purpose of RDF Schema? was RE: What is the natureofHTML4.0?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: [RDDL] Java Object Model
  • From: Ken MacLeod <ken@bitsko.slc.ut.us>
• RE: [RDDL] Java Object Model
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• #PCDATA with other elements
  • From: Huaxin Zhang <hxzhang@cs.ualberta.ca>
• Re: #PCDATA with other elements
  • From: Rob Lugt <roblugt@elcel.com>
• Re: #PCDATA with other elements
  • From: Bob Kline <bkline@rksystems.com>
• RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• ANN: Unicorn XML Toolkit
  • From: Alexey Gokhberg <alexei@bluewin.ch>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
• [RDDL] Cache / Security Model
  • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@earthlink.net>
• Re: [RDDL] Java Object Model
  • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@earthlink.net>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• XML editors: a spec. [was: Suggestions for XML editors]
  • From: Jean-Marc VANEL <jmvanel@industrysuppliers.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schemaambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• RE: [RDDL] Java Object Model
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: XML and embedded systems
  • From: Mark Baker <mark.baker@canada.sun.com>
• XML Integration
  • From: Jon Ceanfaglione <Jcean@cisglobal.com>
• Deadline approaching for KT2001
  • From: "Elledge, Marion" <melledge@printing.org>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
• Re: XML Integration
  • From: Bill Cummings <cummings@sae.org>
• Re: [RDDL] Cache / Security Model
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: "K.Kawaguchi" <k-kawa@bigfoot.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: "K.Kawaguchi" <k-kawa@bigfoot.com>
• Check XML for well formedness
  • From: gramanan@edify.com
• RE: Check XML for well formedness
  • From: "Julian F. Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
• Accessing XSL tree after applying imports
  • From: jsinnott@classifind.com (John Sinnott)
• RE: MSXML Parser version/mode installed
  • From: Newsha Makooi <Newsha@imrgold.com>
• MSXML Parser version/mode installed -- Follow up.
  • From: Newsha Makooi <Newsha@imrgold.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schemaambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
• The Division of Schema - A Practical Perspective (Re: Are we losingout because of grammars?)
  • From: Jay Zhang <jz@intermicstech.com>
• RE: XML Integration
  • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com>
• RE: [RDDL] Java Object Model
  • From: Michael Brennan <Michael_Brennan@Allegis.com>
• Re: XML Integration
  • From: Anatole Tartakovsky <anatolet@teamcti.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
  • From: Inga Eckermann <inga.eckermann@profi-consult.de>
• Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
  • From: Caroline Clewlow <cclewlow@eris.dera.gov.uk>
• Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
  • From: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
• Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
  • From: Bob Kline <bkline@rksystems.com>
• RE: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
  • From: Bob Kline <bkline@rksystems.com>
• ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released
  • From: Mike Geiger <mike@PerCurrence.com>
• RE: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
  • From: Bob Kline <bkline@rksystems.com>
• RE: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• Re: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released
  • From: Matt Sergeant <matt@sergeant.org>
• RE: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
  • From: Bob Kline <bkline@rksystems.com>
• Re: xml-dev-digest Digest #217
  • From: Murata Makoto <mura034@attglobal.net>
• RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Re: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released
  • From: Nicolas Guzman <guzmann@erols.com>
• RE: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
  • From: "David E. Cleary" <davec@progress.com>
• RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Michael Fitzgerald <mike@wyeast.net>
• Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• appinfo considered harmful. Re: What is the advantage of RELAX incomparison to Schemas?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@interx.com>
• RE: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released
  • From: "Robert C. Lyons" <boblyons@unidex.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: "K.Kawaguchi" <k-kawa@bigfoot.com>
• RE: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released
  • From: "Clark C. Evans" <cce@clarkevans.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• RE: appinfo considered harmful. Re: What is the advantage of RELAX incomparison to Schemas?
  • From: "David E. Cleary" <davec@progress.com>
• Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• How can I access the xsl import tree?
  • From: jsinnott@classifind.com (John Sinnott)
• Re: How can I access the xsl import tree?
  • From: Robin Berjon <robin@knowscape.com>
• Disabling DTD Validation
  • From: "Scerri, Antony (ELSLON)" <antony.scerri@biomednet.com>
• RE: ANNOUNCE
  • From: Ramin Firoozye <ramin@wizen.com>
• What IS a valid URI Reference?
  • From: David Hunter <david.hunter@mobileq.com>
• Re: ANNOUNCE
  • From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
• Disabling DTD Validation Cont.
  • From: "Scerri, Antony (ELSLON)" <antony.scerri@biomednet.com>
• RE: ANNOUNCE
  • From: Marek Kowalczyk <marek@zip.com.au>
• RE: ANNOUNCE
  • From: David LeBlanc <whisper@oz.net>
• RE: ANNOUNCE
  • From: Bob Kline <bkline@rksystems.com>
• RE: ANNOUNCE
  • From: Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com
• Re: Disabling DTD Validation Cont.
  • From: Michael Beddow <mbnospam@mbeddow.net>
• Re: Disabling DTD Validation Cont.
  • From: Bob Kline <bkline@rksystems.com>
• RE: Disabling DTD Validation Cont.
  • From: "Scerri, Antony (ELSLON)" <antony.scerri@biomednet.com>
• RE: ANNOUNCE
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: Disabling DTD Validation Cont.
  • From: Wayne Steele <xmlmaster@hotmail.com>
• RE: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released
  • From: Eric Bohlman <ebohlman@earthlink.net>
• RE: Disabling DTD Validation Cont.
  • From: Bob Kline <bkline@rksystems.com>
• Re: appinfo considered harmful. Re: What is the advantage of RELAXincomparison to Schemas?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• RE: ANNOUNCE
  • From: Matt Sergeant <matt@sergeant.org>
• Re: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released
  • From: Ken North <ken_north@compuserve.com>
• [ANNOUNCE] PullParser 1.1
  • From: Aleksander Slominski <aslom@cs.indiana.edu>
• RE: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released
  • From: Mike Geiger <mike@PerCurrence.com>
• RE: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released
  • From: "Robert C. Lyons" <boblyons@unidex.com>
• No Subject
  • From: ganesh_br@polaris.co.in
• Reg Validation of xml
  • From: ganesh_br@polaris.co.in
• Re: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released
  • From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@qub.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schemaambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
• Re: Disabling DTD Validation Cont.
  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Charles Reitzel <creitzel@mediaone.net>
• Re: Reg Validation of xml
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• Re: [ANNOUNCE] PullParser 1.1
  • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
• Re: Disabling DTD Validation Cont.
  • From: Rob Lugt <roblugt@elcel.com>
• RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@interx.com>
• Wanted: GUI XML
  • From: Heinz Wehner <Heinz.Wehner@ecoBus.de>
• Re: Wanted: GUI XML
  • From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@idoox.com>
• Re: Wanted: GUI XML
  • From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
• Re: Wanted: GUI XML
  • From: olivier.dameron@gmx.net
• Re: Wanted: GUI XML
  • From: Ian Graham <igraham@ic-unix.ic.utoronto.ca>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schemaambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
• RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: Peter Jones <peterj@wrox.com>
• Re: Wanted: GUI XML
  • From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
• RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: appinfo considered harmful. Re: What is the advantage of RELAXincomparison to Schemas?
  • From: "David E. Cleary" <davec@progress.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re:Schemaambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: Mark Baker <mark.baker@canada.sun.com>
• RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@interx.com>
• RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• RE: Reg Validation of xml
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices
  • From: Francis Norton <francis@redrice.com>
• [Ann.] XML Schema FAQ
  • From: Francis Norton <francis@redrice.com>
• Registrars of terminology (was Re: Are we losing out because ofgrammars?)
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• RE: Registrars of terminology (was Re: Are we losing out because ofgrammars?)
  • From: "Arnold, Curt" <Curt.Arnold@hyprotech.com>
• Re : Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguit ydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4))
  • From: "Vegt, Jan" <Jan.Vegt@softwareag.com>
• Haiku (was Re: ANNOUNCE)
  • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@earthlink.net>
• RE: Registrars of terminology (was Re: Are we losing out because ofgrammars?)
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• Re: Registrars of terminology
  • From: Uche Ogbuji <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
• External Controlled Vocabularies (was Re: Are we losing out becauseof grammars? )
  • From: Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
• RE: Registrars of terminology
  • From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
• New to xml and trying to find sample implementation....
  • From: Atchuta Kumar <akumar@kasenna.com>
• Re: [Ann.] XML Schema FAQ
  • From: Jeff Rafter <jeffrafter@earthlink.net>
• Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema
  • From: Dave Carlson <dcarlson@ontogenics.com>
• Re: [Ann.] XML Schema FAQ
  • From: Francis Norton <francis@redrice.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: "K.Kawaguchi" <k-kawa@bigfoot.com>
• Re: appinfo considered harmful. Re: What is the advantage ofRELAXincomparison to Schemas?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
• XSLTUK conference/tutorial: last chance to register
  • From: "Sebastian Rahtz,,," <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
• Re: appinfo considered harmful. Re: What is the advantage ofRELAXincomparison to Schemas?
  • From: Joe English <jenglish@flightlab.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Paul Tchistopolskii <paul@qub.com>
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?
  • From: Ken North <ken_north@compuserve.com>
• RE: appinfo considered harmful. Re: What is the advantageofRELAXincomparison to Schemas?
  • From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>