[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Haiku
- From: "Manos M. Batsis" <manosb@profile.gr>
- To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Fri, 19 Jan 2001 02:27:31 +0200
Hi all. Can someone point me to a Haiku spec? lol... i want to write one too and i want to
be sure t has no errors ;-)
-----Original Message-----
From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@reutershealth.com]
Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2001 10:25 PM
To: Bullard, Claude L (Len)
Cc: Rick Jelliffe; xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Subject: Re: Haiku
Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:
> "Draconian code
> Parsing corrupt XML
> Returns no errors."
>
> Which would be a surprise I guess, but a bad season.
You could change the third line to
"No errors fall out."
Which restores the seasonal reference (at least in American English).
--
There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Haiku
- From: Marcus Carr <mrc@allette.com.au>
- References:
- Re: Haiku
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>