Mail Thread Index

• Date Index

• Re: XML Catalog proposal, Uche Ogbuji
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XML Catalog proposal, Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: XML Catalog proposal, Sean B. Palmer
• Re: Semantic Web Hackings, Sean B. Palmer
  • RE: Semantic Web Hackings, Jason Diamond
    • Re: Semantic Web Hackings, Sean B. Palmer
      • RE: Semantic Web Hackings, Jason Diamond
      • Re: Semantic Web Hackings, Sean B. Palmer
      • RE: Semantic Web Hackings, Jason Diamond
      • Re: Semantic Web Hackings, Sean B. Palmer
      • RE: Semantic Web Hackings, Jason Diamond
      • RE: Semantic Web Hackings, Danny Ayers
  • Re: Semantic Web Hackings, Dan Brickley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Semantic Web Hackings, Sean B. Palmer
• RE: data smushing, Jason Diamond
  • RE: data smushing, David Megginson
    • RE: data smushing, Dan Brickley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: data smushing, Bill dehOra
  • RE: data smushing, Bill dehOra
  • Re: data smushing, Dan Brickley
• XNRL, Tim Bray
  • Re: XNRL, Sean B. Palmer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XNRL, Uche Ogbuji
    • RE: XNRL, Jonathan Borden
• re: Namespace Basic Principles, Dan Brickley
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Namespace Basic Principles, Bill dehOra
    • Medieval Metadata (was RE: Namespace Basic Principles), David Megginson
• Dereferencing Namespace URIs considered harmful, John Wilson
  • Re: Dereferencing Namespace URIs considered harmful, Sean McGrath
  • Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing, David Megginson
    • Re: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing, Clark C. Evans
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Dereferencing Namespace URIs considered harmful, Uche Ogbuji
  • RE: Dereferencing Namespace URIs considered harmful, Edwin.Fine
  • Re: Dereferencing Namespace URIs considered harmful, Uche Ogbuji
    • Re: Dereferencing Namespace URIs considered harmful, John Wilson
      • RE: Dereferencing Namespace URIs considered harmful, Jonathan Borden
• Plan A + Plan B = Plan C?, Sean B. Palmer
• Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?, Miles Sabin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?, Uche Ogbuji
    • Re: Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?, Sean B. Palmer
    • RE: Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?, Jonathan Borden
  • RE: Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?, Miles Sabin
    • XML Namespace Catalog proposal 2nd edition, Jonathan Borden
  • RE: Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?, Miles Sabin
  • Re: Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?, Uche Ogbuji
  • RE: Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?, Miles Sabin
• XML Display in IE5/Netscape - Urgent, Dev Tuli
  • Re: XML Display in IE5/Netscape - Urgent, David Carlisle
• RE: XML Namespace Catalog proposal 2nd edition, Miles Sabin
• Namespace Catalogue Hackery (long, mostly code), Uche Ogbuji
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Namespace Catalogue Hackery (long, mostly code), Miles Sabin
• Plan B+1 = Plan C+1, Sean B. Palmer
  • RE: Plan B+1 = Plan C+1, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: Plan B+1 = Plan C+1, Sean B. Palmer
      • RE: Plan B+1 = Plan C+1, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Plan B+1 = Plan C+1, Sean B. Palmer
    • Re: Plan B+1 = Plan C+1, David Carlisle
• questions re WD-xml-infoset-20001220, james anderson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: questions re WD-xml-infoset-20001220, Mike.Champion
    • RE: questions re WD-xml-infoset-20001220, Jonathan Borden
• the questions remains [was Re: Begging the Question, james anderson
  • Re: the questions remains [was Re: Begging the Question, Rick Jelliffe
• Odd timing of XML-DEV mail, Uche Ogbuji
• Re: simple question on namespaces., Arjun Ray
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: simple question on namespaces., Norman Walsh
• RE: Web service and Semantic Web, Bill dehOra
  • RE: Web service and Semantic Web, URAMOTO Naohiko
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Web service and Semantic Web, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Web service and Semantic Web, URAMOTO Naohiko
  • RE: Web service and Semantic Web, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Web service and Semantic Web, Bill dehOra
• RE: Success factors for the Web and Semantic Web, Bill dehOra
  • OffTopic (was RE: Success factors for the Web and Semantic Web), Sean McGrath
• RE: A Light Rant On Ontological Commitment, Bill dehOra
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: A Light Rant On Ontological Commitment, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: A Light Rant On Ontological Commitment, Bill dehOra
  • RE: A Light Rant On Ontological Commitment, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: A Light Rant On Ontological Commitment, Bill dehOra
  • RE: A Light Rant On Ontological Commitment, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: Medieval Metadata (was RE: Namespace Basic Principles), Miles Sabin
• RE: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing, Miles Sabin
  • RE: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing, David Megginson
    • Re: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing, Jonathan Borden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing, Miles Sabin
    • Re: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing, Norman Walsh
      • Re: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing, Henry S. Thompson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing, Norman Walsh
      • Re: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing, Henry S. Thompson
  • RE: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing, Miles Sabin
    • Re: Traffic Analysis and Namespace Dereferencing, Norman Walsh
• Resource discovery directory [was: XML Catalog proposal], Paul Grosso
  • Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XML Catalog proposal], Jonathan Borden
• RE: local, global (was various ontology, RDF, topic maps), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Problem w/ Schema for elements with similar defs, Jeff Rafter
  • RE: Problem w/ Schema for elements with similar defs, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
    • Re: Problem w/ Schema for elements with similar defs, Henry S. Thompson
      • RE: Problem w/ Schema for elements with similar defs, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
      • Re: Problem w/ Schema for elements with similar defs, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: Problem w/ Schema for elements with similar defs, Eddie Robertsson
• Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XML Catalogproposal]], Uche Ogbuji
• Making Resource Glosses Real (i.e. -> xml.org), Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: Making Resource Glosses Real (i.e. -> xml.org), Norman Walsh
• RE: XML vs HTTP, Mike Brown
• Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XMLCatalog proposal]], Paul Grosso
  • Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XMLCatalog proposal]], Dan Brickley
    • Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was:XMLCatalog proposal]], Sean B. Palmer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XMLCatalog proposal]], Uche Ogbuji
    • Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was:XMLCatalog proposal]], Sean B. Palmer
  • Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XMLCatalog proposal]], Uche Ogbuji
    • Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was: XMLCatalog proposal]], Dan Brickley
      • Re: Resource gloss [was:Re: Resource discovery directory [was:XMLCatalog proposal]], Rick Jelliffe
• Re: Resource gloss, Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: Resource gloss, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: Resource gloss, Sean McGrath
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Resource gloss, Uche Ogbuji
  • RE: Resource gloss, Miles Sabin
    • Re: Resource gloss, Sean B. Palmer
      • Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Jeff Rafter
      • Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Tim Bray
      • Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Jonathan Borden
      • XHTML m12n XSD, Sean B. Palmer
      • Re: XHTML m12n XSD, Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Jeff Rafter
      • Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Jeff Rafter
• RE: What is XP?, Eve L. Maler
  • Re: What is XP?, RENOUPREZ Jean-Luc
• XML representation of grammers?, Clark C. Evans
  • Re: XML representation of grammers?, Jonathan Borden
• XML Namespace Gloss: Proposal, Sean B. Palmer
• RE: XLang, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Namespace or document gloss?, Miles Sabin
  • Message not available
    • Re: Namespace or document gloss?, Edd Dumbill
      • Re: Namespace or document gloss?, Sean B. Palmer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Namespace or document gloss?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Namespace or document gloss?, Miles Sabin
    • Message not available
      • Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?), Edd Dumbill
      • Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?), Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?), Tim Bray
      • RE: Related resources, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?), Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: Namespace or document gloss?, Paul Grosso
  • RE: Namespace or document gloss?, Miles Sabin
• RE: Treaty of Wulai, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Newbie in the room, Richard Wrightsman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Newbie in the room, Richard Wrightsman
• RE: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?), Miles Sabin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?), Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?), Paul Grosso
• Transfering XML Documents Using HTTP Post - Objects vs text <or> myenvironment or yours, Jerry Murray
  • RE: Transfering XML Documents Using HTTP Post - Objects vs text <or>myenvironment or yours, Evan Lenz
• Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL), Jonathan Borden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL), Jonathan Borden
    • Re: Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL), Sean B. Palmer
      • Re: Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL), Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL), Sean B. Palmer
      • Re: Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL), Jonathan Borden
      • Approach to XHTML M12N in XML Schemas (was Re: Resource DirectoryDescription Language (RDDL)), Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Approach to XHTML M12N in XML Schemas (was Re: ResourceDirectoryDescription Language (RDDL)), Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL), Jonathan Borden
  • Re: Resource Directory Description Language (RDDL), Uche Ogbuji
• xml editor for unix platform, Sean Kim
  • Re: xml editor for unix platform, Dave Winer
  • Re: xml editor for unix platform, Bob Kline
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: xml editor for unix platform, Linda van den Brink
• XML document generation?, ssiddiqui
  • RE: XML document generation?, Fabio Arciniegas A.
• Any language to GUI from XML db?, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Any language to GUI from XML db?, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
• RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Paul Grosso
  • RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Charles Reitzel
    • RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Tim Bray
    • RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Jonathan Borden
  • RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Charles Reitzel
    • Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), John Cowan
  • Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Charles Reitzel
    • Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), John Cowan
  • Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Paul Grosso
  • RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Michael Brennan
    • RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Jonathan Borden
  • RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Michael Brennan
    • Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), John Cowan
  • RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Paul Grosso
  • RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Paul Grosso
  • RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Michael Brennan
    • RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Tim Bray
  • RE: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Charles Reitzel
    • Re: Resource Gloss (Human Readable), Tim Bray
• vb vs java and future with XML, e.e
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: vb vs java and future with XML, Michael Brennan
    • .Net vs java and future with XML, e.e
• Minor tragicomedy of errors, Uche Ogbuji
• RE: Transfering XML Documents Using HTTP Post - Objects vs text <or>my environment or yours, Michael Brennan
• Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Arnold, Curt
  • RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
    • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Eddie Robertsson
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Jeff Rafter
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Martin Bryan
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Caroline Clewlow
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Martin Bryan
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Martin Bryan
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Eddie Robertsson
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Jeff Rafter
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Jeff Rafter
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Caroline Clewlow
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Martin Bryan
      • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Roger L. Costello
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Curt Arnold
  • RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Arnold, Curt
  • RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Martin Bryan
  • RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Arnold, Curt
  • FW: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Arnold, Curt
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices, Francis Norton
• RDDL API, Jonathan Borden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: RDDL API, Michael Brennan
    • RE: RDDL API, Jonathan Borden
  • RE: RDDL API, Michael Brennan
    • RE: RDDL API, Jonathan Borden
• Spanish list?, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
  • Re: Spanish list?, Jose Luis Sierra Rodriguez
    • RE: Spanish list?, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
• XML Protocol Requirements Document Published, Martin Gudgin
• XML from VB, RamMohan
  • RE: XML from VB, Julian F. Reschke
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML from VB, Ben Sarsgard
• Re: [xml-doc] [ANN] XSLTUK conference, April 2001 (, Sebastian Rahtz
  • [ANN] XSLTUK conference, April 2001 (latest), Sebastian Rahtz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: [xml-doc] [ANN] XSLTUK conference, April 2001 (, Sebastian Rahtz
• Re: Not authorized to submit to elist: xml-dev, John Cowan
• matching, e.e
  • Re: matching, G. Ken Holman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: matching, Ruan Malan
• RE: XHTML m12n XSD, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: XHTML m12n XSD, Sean B. Palmer
  • Re: XHTML m12n XSD, Rick Jelliffe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XHTML m12n XSD, Mike.Champion
    • Re: XHTML m12n XSD, Sean B. Palmer
    • RE: XHTML m12n XSD, Ann Navarro
  • RE: XHTML m12n XSD, Steve Boyce
  • RE: XHTML m12n XSD, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: XHTML m12n XSD, Ann Navarro
      • RE: XHTML m12n XSD, Tim Bray
      • RE: XHTML m12n XSD, Christopher R. Maden
  • RE: XHTML m12n XSD, Arnold, Curt
    • Re: XHTML m12n XSD, Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: XHTML m12n XSD, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: XHTML m12n XSD, Ann Navarro
  • RE: XHTML m12n XSD, Arnold, Curt
    • RE: XHTML m12n XSD, Ann Navarro
  • RE: XHTML m12n XSD, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: XHTML m12n XSD, Curt Arnold
    • Re: XHTML m12n XSD, Rick Jelliffe
• [Zvon] VoiceXML Reference, Miloslav Nic
• Re: simple question on namespaces, John Cowan
• schemas: can I restrict an elem's content based on att value?, Imran Rashid
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: schemas: can I restrict an elem's content based on att value?, Arnold, Curt
    • Re: schemas: can I restrict an elem's content based on att value?, Imran Rashid
  • RE: schemas: can I restrict an elem's content based on att value?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: schemas: can I restrict an elem's content based on att value?, Arnold, Curt
• [Zvon] Zvon Character Reference, Miloslav Nic
• help needed, Jerry Johns
  • RE: help needed, Julian F. Reschke
• Re: layers of options in XML processing, Henry S. Thompson
• open source tool, Vicky Papaioannou
  • Re: open source tool, Justin Buist
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: open source tool, Michael Brennan
• XSLT's Template Dispatch, Clark C. Evans
  • XSLT: beyond a transformation tool for XML documents, Jose Luis Sierra Rodriguez
• And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Henry S. Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Danny Vint
      • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Joe English
      • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Norman Walsh
      • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Dan Vint
      • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Norman Walsh
      • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Caroline Clewlow
      • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Norman Walsh
      • Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"), Marcus Carr
      • Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"), Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"), Marcus Carr
      • Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"), Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"), Marcus Carr
      • RDDL and entities (was Re: Schemas and entities (was"And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"), Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"), Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"), David Carlisle
      • Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"), Henry S. Thompson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"), Henry S. Thompson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"), Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"), David Carlisle
      • Turning off validation (was Re: Schemas and entities), Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: Turning off validation (was Re: Schemas and entities), David Carlisle
      • Re: Schemas and entities (was "And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"), Marcus Carr
      • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Bob Kline
      • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Norman Walsh
      • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Caroline Clewlow
      • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Norman Walsh
      • Multiple rules in RELAX (was Re: And the DTD says...), Murata Makoto
      • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", James Clark
      • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Rick Jelliffe
    • RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Danny Vint
    • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Rick Jelliffe
    • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Norman Walsh
  • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Sean B. Palmer
  • RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Sean B. Palmer
      • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Henry S. Thompson
    • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", John Cowan
  • RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Dan Vint
  • RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Simon St.Laurent
      • RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Arjun Ray
      • RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Ann Navarro
    • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Rick Jelliffe
      • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Simon St.Laurent
  • RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", John Cowan
  • RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Tony Coates
  • RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!", Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: schemas: can I restrict an elem's content based on att value, Arnold, Curt
• binary base64 definition, Jerry Johns
  • RE: binary base64 definition, Julian F. Reschke
  • Re: binary base64 definition, Dan Vint
    • Re: binary base64 definition, Ian Graham
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: binary base64 definition, Jerry Johns
    • RE: binary base64 definition, Danny Vint
    • RE: binary base64 definition, Ian Graham
  • RE: binary base64 definition, Jerry Johns
    • RE: binary base64 definition, Danny Vint
      • RE: binary base64 definition, Ian Graham
    • Message not available
      • Re: binary base64 definition, Amy Lewis
• [ANN] Keynotes, workshops, and classes at XML DevCon Spring 2001 (NewYork City, April 8-11), Ken North
• What Schema can do what DTD can't, Dream Catcher
• Unsuccessful attempts at validating xsd:any, Ryan Dewell
  • Re: Unsuccessful attempts at validating xsd:any, Henry S. Thompson
• XRay XSLT/XML editor, Simon St.Laurent
  • Re: XRay XSLT/XML editor, Chuck White
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XRay XSLT/XML editor, AndrewWatt2000
    • jEdit for XML (was Re: XRay XSLT/XML editor), Thomas B. Passin
• [RDDL] http://www.rddl.org, Jonathan Borden
• [RDDL] Java API, Jonathan Borden
  • Quick edit, Tim Bray
    • RE: Quick edit, Jonathan Borden
      • RE: Quick edit, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Quick edit, Henry S. Thompson
      • URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit, Jonathan Borden
      • RE: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit, Jason Diamond
      • Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit, Tim Bray
      • RE: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit, Jason Diamond
      • RE: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit, Henry S. Thompson
      • Message not available
      • Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit, John Aldridge
      • Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit, Henry S. Thompson
      • RE: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit, Jason Diamond
      • RDDL: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatch on related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way to dispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,, Thomas B. Passin
      • RE: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way to dispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,, Jason Diamond
      • Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way to dispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way to dispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,, Henry S. Thompson
      • Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,, Henry S. Thompson
      • RE: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,, Jason Diamond
      • Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,, Henry S. Thompson
      • role, arcrole, purpose, nature, Tim Bray
      • RDDL: Namespace URIs as document types. was Re: URIs,names and well known RDDL names, Jonathan Borden
      • RE: RDDL: Namespace URIs as document types. was Re: URIs,names and well known RDDL names, Jason Diamond
      • Re: RDDL: Namespace URIs as document types. was Re: URIs,names and well known RDDL names, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit, Henry S. Thompson
      • RDDL requirements, Jonathan Borden
      • RE: RDDL requirements, Jason Diamond
• Cobol Copybooks to XML, Michael.Rohde
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Cobol Copybooks to XML, Ruan Malan
  • Re: Cobol Copybooks to XML, Michael.Rohde
• Re: Begging the Question, Paul W. Abrahams
• [ANN] IdooXoap with EJB; preconfigured Tomcat, Jacek Kopecky
• Unprefixed attribute names in RDF, Joe English
  • Re: Unprefixed attribute names in RDF, Tim Bray
    • Re: Unprefixed attribute names in RDF, David Megginson
      • Re: Unprefixed attribute names in RDF, Tim Bray
      • Re: Unprefixed attribute names in RDF, Dave Beckett
• RE: Why doesn't this solve this namepaces problem?, Jonathan Borden
• XPath: how to select based on element type?, Sankaranarayanan K V
  • Re: XPath: how to select based on element type?, Matt Sergeant
    • Message not available
      • Re: XPath: how to select based on element type?, Sankaranarayanan K V
      • Re: XPath: how to select based on element type?, Eric van der Vlist
      • Message not available
      • Re: XPath: how to select based on element type?, Sankaranarayanan K V
      • Re: XPath: how to select based on element type?, Matt Sergeant
• SAX2 bugs???, David Megginson
• TREX - a new schema language, James Clark
• [ANN]: SIX, Peter Jones
  • Predicate Logic in XML (was Re: [ANN]: SIX), Henry S. Thompson
    • RE: Predicate Logic in XML (was Re: [ANN]: SIX), Danny Ayers
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [ANN]: SIX, Peter Jones
• (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Daniel Veillard
  • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Elliotte Rusty Harold
    • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Eric van der Vlist
    • Message not available
      • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Tim Bray
      • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Eve L. Maler
      • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Ben Trafford
      • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Ann Navarro
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Message not available
      • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Ann Navarro
      • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, John Cowan
      • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Tim Bray
      • Fighting Software Patents, David Megginson
      • Re: Fighting Software Patents, Paul Tchistopolskii
  • RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Message not available
      • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Eric van der Vlist
      • Message not available
      • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Thomas B. Passin
      • Message not available
      • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Daniel Veillard
      • Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0), Dave Winer
      • Re: Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0), Dave Winer
      • Message not available
      • Re: Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0), Edd Dumbill
      • Re: Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0), Dave Winer
      • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, John Cowan
  • RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Message not available
      • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Daniel Veillard
    • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0 <offtopic>, Jeff Rafter
  • RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, John Cowan
  • RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • FW: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: FW: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0, John Aldridge
    • RDDL and Schema Localization, Jeff Rafter
      • Re: RDDL and Schema Localization, Jonathan Borden
      • RE: RDDL and Schema Localization, Jason Diamond
      • RE: RDDL and Schema Localization, Jonathan Borden
• Re: [ANN]: SIX), Peter Jones
• Deadline for papers for XML Europe 2001 extended till Friday 13 January, Elledge, Marion
• Silly XML statistic, Steven J. DeRose
• Re: Global Attributes Not Covered by the XML Specification?, Tim Bray
• RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices (touches XHTML modularization als o), Arnold, Curt
  • Re: XML Schemas: Best Practices (touches XHTML modularization als o), Martin Bryan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML Schemas: Best Practices (touches XHTML modularization als o), Arnold, Curt
• Q: How to create DTD from relational database?, Brian Miller
• What is happened with Balise?, Oleg A. Paraschenko
  • Re: What is happened with Balise?, Heinz Wittenbrink
  • RE: What is happened with Balise?, Michael Fitzgerald
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: What is happened with Balise?, Linda van den Brink
• [Zvon] MathML 2 Reference updated to reflect Proposed Recommendation, Miloslav Nic
• [OT?] Your opinion please, :-Koshy Kerteya-:
• XSL Help, Kumar V.
  • Re: XSL Help, G. Ken Holman
• [Zvon] XML Schema Reference, Miloslav Nic
• Script model, Richard Schreier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Script model, Bill dehOra
• Article on RDF and Natural Language Processing, Uche Ogbuji
• XML-RPC for C and C++, Dave Winer
• XML Presentations available, David E. Cleary
• XML & Database, Natarajan Karthikeyan
  • Re: XML & Database, Steve Muench
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML & Database, Jerry Murray
  • Re: XML & Database, Uche Ogbuji
• xml 2 postscript, Pollington, Lee (ELSLON)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: xml 2 postscript, David Tolpin
• DTD and Illegal Construct, Jim Shain
  • Re: DTD and Illegal Construct, John Cowan
  • Re: DTD and Illegal Construct, Dan Vint
  • Re: DTD and Illegal Construct, Marcus Carr
  • Re: DTD and Illegal Construct, Robin Cover
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: DTD and Illegal Construct, Dudley, Mark
  • RE: DTD and Illegal Construct, Jim Shain
    • Re: DTD and Illegal Construct, Marcus Carr
  • RE: DTD and Illegal Construct, Jim Shain
    • Re: DTD and Illegal Construct, Dan Vint
    • Re: DTD and Illegal Construct, Marcus Carr
    • Re: DTD and Illegal Construct, Thomas B. Passin
  • RE: DTD and Illegal Construct, Gregory M. Messner
  • RE: DTD and Illegal Construct, Xan Gregg
  • RE: DTD and Illegal Construct, Jim Shain
    • RE: DTD and Illegal Construct, Deborah Aleyne Lapeyre
      • Re: DTD and Illegal Construct, Marcus Carr
  • RE: DTD and Illegal Construct, Richard Tobin
    • Re: DTD and Illegal Construct, James Clark
• Re: RDDL: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatch on related resources?, Jonathan Borden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: RDDL: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatch on related resources?, Jonathan Borden
• Fw: RDDL: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatch on related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,, Jonathan Borden
• Announce: The RSL Project (Reticular Structure Layer | Language), Paul Cody Johnston
• Schema localization? *Newbie alert*, Vegt, Jan
  • Re: Schema localization? *Newbie alert*, Bob DuCharme
    • Re: Schema localization? *Newbie alert*, Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: Schema localization? *Newbie alert*, John F. Schlesinger
• RE: RDDL: Namespace URIs as document types. was Re: URIs,names and well known RDDL names, John Cowan
  • Re: RDDL: Namespace URIs as document types. was Re: URIs,names andwell known RDDL names, Jonathan Borden
• More SIX, Peter Jones
• Of the XPointer Patent [was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0]>, Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: Of the XPointer Patent [was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer1.0]>, John Cowan
• Of the XPointer Patent, Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: Of the XPointer Patent, Thomas B. Passin
• XML Tools for Linux & Unix, Bill
• Aelfred2 Problem, Scerri, Antony (ELSLON)
• How compatible are XML Schema implementations?, Jonathan Robie
  • RE: How compatible are XML Schema implementations?, John F. Schlesinger
  • Re: How compatible are XML Schema implementations?, Jonathan Robie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: How compatible are XML Schema implementations?, Arnold, Curt
• URI references and UTF-8 based escaping, Mike Brown
• [ANN] Updated version of DTD to XML Schema tool, Mary Holstege
• XPointer and Sun patent, Paul W. Abrahams
  • Re: XPointer and Sun patent, Paul Tchistopolskii
  • Message not available
    • Re: XPointer and Sun patent, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: XPointer and Sun patent, Paul W. Abrahams
      • Message not available
      • Re: XPointer and Sun patent, Daniel Veillard
• white hat patents?, da - dan ancona
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: white hat patents?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Lawyers. Re: XPointer and Sun patent, Paul Tchistopolskii
  • Re: Lawyers. Re: XPointer and Sun patent, Bob DuCharme
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Lawyers. Re: XPointer and Sun patent, Paul Tchistopolskii
• Re: Turning off validation (was Re: Schemas and entities), Richard Tobin
  • Re: Turning off validation (was Re: Schemas and entities), David Carlisle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Turning off validation (was Re: Schemas and entities), Richard Tobin
    • Standard RDDL processing order or ALL?, Jeff Rafter
      • Re: Standard RDDL processing order or ALL?, Jonathan Borden
• convert XML to Canonical XML, Alexander Nakhimovsky
  • RE: convert XML to Canonical XML, Michael Fitzgerald
• Catalogs: another angle, Miles Sabin
  • Message not available
    • Re: Catalogs: another angle, Michael Mealling
• RE: Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1 .0), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0 <offtopic>, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Generate Samples from Schemas, Michael.Rohde
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Generate Samples from Schemas, Dan Vint
• Announce: Updated DocBook Schemas, Norman Walsh
  • Re: Announce: Updated DocBook Schemas, Norman Walsh
• ANNOUNCE: XML Spy 3.5 Beta 4 available for download, XML Spy
• Transforming an XML Document into another, Newsha Makooi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Transforming an XML Document into another, Mike Brown
• a simple question, George Fang
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: a simple question, Jeff Rafter
• Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), Alexey Gokhberg
  • Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), Elliotte Rusty Harold
    • Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), Alexey Gokhberg
  • Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), Matt Sergeant
    • Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), Alexey Gokhberg
  • Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), James Clark
    • Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), Alexey Gokhberg
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), Uche Ogbuji
    • Message not available
      • Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), Daniel Veillard
  • RE: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), Mike.Champion
    • Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), Alexey Gokhberg
  • Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), Uche Ogbuji
    • Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), Anatole Tartakovsky
  • Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), Uche Ogbuji
  • RE: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), Mike.Champion
    • Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), Alexey Gokhberg
  • RE: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), Mike.Champion
    • Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), Alexey Gokhberg
  • RE: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), Mike.Champion
    • Re: Place under sun (was: XPointer and Sun patent), Alexey Gokhberg
• Submit your schema and stylesheet problems, Ken North
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Submit your schema and stylesheet problems, Ken North
    • The importance of XML (2 programs in Technetcast Top 30), Ken North
• SyncML is kind of interesting, Tim Bray
  • RE: SyncML is kind of interesting, Didier PH Martin
• RE: Fighting Software Patents, Steve Boyce
• Language politics and DOM bindings, Uche Ogbuji
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Language politics and DOM bindings, Lauren Wood
  • Re: Language politics and DOM bindings, Uche Ogbuji
• difference, ersin
• should all XML parsers reject non-deterministic content models?, TAKAHASHI Hideo(BSD-13G)
  • Message not available
    • Re: should all XML parsers reject non-deterministic content models?, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: should all XML parsers reject non-deterministic content models?, James Clark
      • Message not available
      • Re: should all XML parsers reject non-deterministic content models?, Daniel Veillard
      • Re: should all XML parsers reject non-deterministic content models?, TAKAHASHI Hideo(BSD-13G)
  • Re: should all XML parsers reject non-deterministic content models?, Joe English
    • RE: should all XML parsers reject non-deterministic content models?, Danny Ayers
• RDDL draft 20010114, Jonathan Borden
  • Re: RDDL draft 20010114, Thomas B. Passin
  • Re: RDDL draft 20010114, Thomas B. Passin
    • RE: RDDL draft 20010114, Jason Diamond
• SVGSpider.com - the world's "first" all SVG web site?, AndrewWatt2000
  • RE: SVGSpider.com - the world's "first" all SVG web site?, Didier PH Martin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SVGSpider.com - the world's "first" all SVG web site?, AndrewWatt2000
• RDDL.NET 2001-01-14, Jason Diamond
  • RE: RDDL.NET 2001-01-14, Jonathan Borden
• One XSL for two XML document, Dream Catcher
  • RE: One XSL for two XML document, Jason Diamond
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • One XSL for two XML document, Dream Catcher
• TREX update, James Clark
  • RE: TREX update, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: TREX update, James Clark
• Excel to XML, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
  • Re: Excel to XML, Matt Sergeant
  • RE: Excel to XML, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
    • Re: Excel to XML, Jeff Veit
  • Re: Excel to XML, Anatole Tartakovsky
  • Re: Excel to XML, Thomas B. Passin
    • RE: Excel to XML, Danny Ayers
  • RE: Excel to XML, Evan Lenz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Excel to XML, Richard Lanyon
• RE: RDDL and Schema Localization, Vegt, Jan
• DTD to W3C schema file?, Giota Karadimitriou
  • Re: DTD to W3C schema file?, Robin Berjon
  • RE: DTD to W3C schema file?, Danny Ayers
• RDDL 2 RSS, Jonathan Borden
• Referring to external DTD's, RamMohan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Referring to external DTD's, Mike Brown
• Dynamic call template, Pietro Venanzangeli
• Push Technologies, Manos M. Batsis
  • RE: Push Technologies, Leigh Dodds
• ANNOUNCE: eXist - xml search engine / repository, Wolfgang Meier
• How could RDDL be distributed ?, Eric van der Vlist
  • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Leigh Dodds
    • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Leigh Dodds
  • Message not available
    • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Michael Mealling
      • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Eric van der Vlist
      • Message not available
      • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Michael Mealling
  • Use cases [was: How could RDDL be distributed ?], Eric van der Vlist
    • Message not available
      • Re: Use cases [was: How could RDDL be distributed ?], Michael Mealling
      • Re: Use cases [was: How could RDDL be distributed ?], Eric van der Vlist
      • Message not available
      • Re: Use cases [was: How could RDDL be distributed ?], Michael Mealling
    • Re: Use cases [was: How could RDDL be distributed ?], Jonathan Borden
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Miles Sabin
  • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Miles Sabin
    • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Leigh Dodds
    • Message not available
      • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Michael Mealling
  • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Miles Sabin
    • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Dave Winer
      • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Leigh Dodds
    • Message not available
      • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Michael Mealling
    • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, John Cowan
  • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Miles Sabin
    • Message not available
      • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Michael Mealling
      • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, James Robertson
      • Message not available
      • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Michael Mealling
      • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, James Robertson
      • Message not available
      • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Michael Mealling
      • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, James Robertson
      • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Danny Ayers
      • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?, James Robertson
      • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Danny Ayers
      • Message not available
      • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, James Robertson
      • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Steve Tinney
  • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Tim Bray
    • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Eric van der Vlist
  • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Miles Sabin
    • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Mark Baker
      • Message not available
      • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Michael Mealling
    • Message not available
      • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Michael Mealling
  • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Miles Sabin
    • Message not available
      • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Michael Mealling
      • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Jonathan Borden
      • Message not available
      • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Michael Mealling
  • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Tim Bray
    • Message not available
      • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Michael Mealling
  • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Miles Sabin
    • Message not available
      • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Michael Mealling
    • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Mark Baker
  • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Eric Bohlman
    • Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Tim Bray
  • RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• ANN: 4Suite 0.10.1, uche.ogbuji
• ANN: 4Suite Server 0.10.1, uche.ogbuji
  • Re: 4Suite Server 0.10.1, Michael Beddow
• RE: Who needs and uses XML Schema key/keyref?, Charlie McCay
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Who needs and uses XML Schema key/keyref?, Arnold, Curt
• CDATA sections, Dawn Volkman
• Publish and subscribe over the Internet, Dave Winer
• Standard DTD..., Seetharam Samptur
• PSGML and automatic default attributes?, Bob DuCharme
  • Re: PSGML and automatic default attributes?, Michael Smith
• need info on XSLT processor, Natarajan Karthikeyan
  • Re: need info on XSLT processor, Bob DuCharme
• xpath axes, Adam Van Den Hoven
  • Re: xpath axes, G. Ken Holman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: xpath axes, sdyck
  • Re: xpath axes, AndrewWatt2000
  • RE: xpath axes, Adam Van Den Hoven
• XPointer syntax, Jeff Lansing
• Re: 4Suite Server 0.10.1, Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: 4Suite Server 0.10.1, Jonathan Borden
• The Aftermath (was Re: 4Suite Server 0.10.1), Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: The Aftermath (was Re: 4Suite Server 0.10.1), Lars Martin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: The Aftermath (was Re: 4Suite Server 0.10.1), Edmund Mitchell
    • Re: The Aftermath (was Re: 4Suite Server 0.10.1), Lars Martin
      • XML application for sport content, Owen Sullivan
• DTD Inheritance.., Seetharam Samptur
  • Re: DTD Inheritance.., Caroline Clewlow
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DTD Inheritance.., Patrick Lightbody
• Determing DTD attributes, Patrick Lightbody
• XML:DB (was Re: The Aftermath), Uche Ogbuji
• [Zvon] XPath tutorial redesigned, Miloslav Nic
• a11n (Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?), Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: a11n (Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?), Jonathan Borden
• [ANN] XML Haiku competition, Paul Spencer
• Re: a11n [OT] (Re: How could RDDL be distributed ?), Uche Ogbuji
• Textual transmission typically faster?, Mark.Papiani
  • Re: Textual transmission typically faster?, Michael Beddow
    • Re: Textual transmission typically faster?, David Megginson
      • RE: Textual transmission typically faster?, Eugene Kuznetsov
      • Re: Textual transmission typically faster?, Caroline Clewlow
      • RE: Textual transmission typically faster?, David Megginson
      • Message not available
      • Re: Textual transmission typically faster?, Paul Cody Johnston
      • Re: Textual transmission typically faster?, Ken North
      • RE: Textual transmission typically faster?, Danny Ayers
      • Re: Textual transmission typically faster?, Ken North
      • RE: Textual transmission typically faster?, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: Textual transmission typically faster?, David Brownell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Textual transmission typically faster?, Bill dehOra
  • RE: Textual transmission typically faster?, Eric Bohlman
• XML vs HTML browser for PDA, Himanshu Kapoor
  • Re: XML vs HTML browser for PDA, Sean B. Palmer
• ANN: Unicorn XML Toolkit documentation preview is available, Alexey Gokhberg
• SVG & XPointer - When I write SVG code can I be sued?, AndrewWatt2000
  • Re: SVG & XPointer - When I write SVG code can I be sued?, Robin Berjon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: SVG & XPointer - When I write SVG code can I be sued?, AndrewWatt2000
    • Re: SVG & XPointer - When I write SVG code can I be sued?, Robin Berjon
• Haiku, Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: Haiku, Danny Ayers
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Haiku, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Haiku, John Cowan
      • RE: Haiku, Manos M. Batsis
      • Re: Haiku, Marcus Carr
  • RE: Haiku, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Haiku, Hodder, Ed
  • RE: Haiku, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: Haiku, Robert C. Lyons
  • RE: Haiku, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Haiku, Marcus Carr
      • Re: Haiku, Tim Bray
      • Re: Haiku, Michael Beddow
  • haiku, Michael Fitzgerald
  • RE: Haiku, Webber, Andrew
  • Re: Haiku, Jeff Rafter
    • Re: Haiku, Aaron Swartz
  • Re: Haiku, Aura Sheffield
  • Haiku, Eric Bohlman
  • Re: Haiku, Eric Bohlman
  • RE: Haiku, John Turnbull
    • RE: Haiku, Paul Spencer
  • RE: Haiku, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Haiku, Masoud Salehi-sedeh
• XPointer WD 20010108 - location-set "error"?, AndrewWatt2000
• Re: XML TO PDF, Daniel Barclay
• Re: Place under sun, Philippe Le Hegaret
• having dtd in a separate file (creating xml document), Kate Lapan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: having dtd in a separate file (creating xml document), Xan Gregg
• CFP: O'Reilly Open Source Conference/XTech XML Track, Edd Dumbill
• ANNOUNCE: XML Spy 3.5 released today - now available for downloading, XML Spy
• Re: What is an XML document?, John Cowan
  • Message not available
    • Re: What is an XML document?, John Cowan
      • Re: What is an XML document?, Michael Beddow
      • Re: What is an XML document?, Simon St.Laurent
      • Re: What is an XML document?, John Cowan
      • RE: What is an XML document?, Michael Fitzgerald
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What is an XML document?, John Cowan
  • RE: What is an XML document?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: What is an XML document?, Bob DuCharme
      • Re: What is an XML document?, Jeff Lansing
      • Re: What is an XML document?, Bob DuCharme
      • Re: What is an XML document?, John Cowan
  • RE: What is an XML document?, Jerry Murray
  • RE: What is an XML document?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• XML "include"?, Patrick Lightbody
  • RE: XML "include"?, Michael Fitzgerald
    • RE: XML "include"?, Patrick Lightbody
      • RE: XML "include"?, Michael Fitzgerald
      • RE: XML "include"?, Ben Trafford
• How could RDDL be internationalised?, Tony Coates
  • Re: How could RDDL be internationalised?, Tim Bray
  • Re: How could RDDL be internationalised?, Jonathan Borden
• archive search feature now available, Karl Best
• Haikus., Ben Trafford
  • Re: Haikus., Philippe Lourier
• Haiku (on XSLT), Rick Jelliffe
• why importNode error like this, Huaxin Zhang
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: why importNode error like this, Mike.Champion
    • RE: why importNode error like this, Huaxin Zhang
  • RE: why importNode error like this, Mike.Champion
• Announce: Ninth Edition of XSLT/XPath Tutorial Materials (XML-Dev List), G. Ken Holman
• [ANNOUNCE] AxKit 1.2, Matt Sergeant
• Get expected firstchild/siblings, Patrick Lightbody
• Abbreviated Tag Names, Don Park
  • RE: Abbreviated Tag Names, Sam
  • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names, Simon St.Laurent
    • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names, Eric van der Vlist
    • RE: Abbreviated Tag Names, Jonathan Borden
      • RE: Abbreviated Tag Names, Don Park
      • RE: Abbreviated Tag Names, Tim Bray
      • RE: Abbreviated Tag Names, Don Park
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Abbreviated Tag Names, Pollington, Lee (ELSLON)
  • Re: Abbreviated Tag Names, Charles Reitzel
• RDDL spec 20010122, Jonathan Borden
• Re: XML 1.0 - Element order significance, Henry S. Thompson
  • RE: XML 1.0 - Element order significance, Danny Ayers
  • Re: XML 1.0 - Element order significance, Tim Bray
    • Re: XML 1.0 - Element order significance, John Cowan
      • RE: XML 1.0 - Element order significance, Danny Ayers
      • Re: XML 1.0 - Element order significance, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: XML 1.0 - Element order significance, Henry S. Thompson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML 1.0 - Element order significance, Mike Brown
    • RE: XML 1.0 - Element order significance, Danny Ayers
    • Re: XML 1.0 - Element order significance, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: XML 1.0 - Element order significance, David Carlisle
      • RE: XML 1.0 - Element order significance, Danny Ayers
      • RE: XML 1.0 - Element order significance, Tim Bray
  • RE: XML 1.0 - Element order significance, Eric Bohlman
• XML ad SOAP, Bovone Stefano
• simpleType hh:mm:ss:ff, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
  • Re: simpleType hh:mm:ss:ff, Bob Kline
    • RE: simpleType hh:mm:ss:ff, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
      • RE: simpleType hh:mm:ss:ff, Bob Kline
      • RE: simpleType hh:mm:ss:ff, Robin Cover
      • RE: simpleType hh:mm:ss:ff, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
      • RE: simpleType hh:mm:ss:ff, =?UNKNOWN?Q?Jos=E9?= Manuel Beas
      • Re: simpleType hh:mm:ss:ff, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: simpleType hh:mm:ss:ff, Bob Kline
• XML and JSP, Anu Ranjan Mishra
• Knowledge Technologies 2001 to address Next Revolution for the W eb---March 4-7, 2001 Austin, TX, Elledge, Marion
• STAX Re: Abbreviated Tag Names, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: STAX Re: Abbreviated Tag Names, Fredrik Lindgren
• ANNOUNCEMENT: Rapier RDF Parser 0.9.0, Dave Beckett
• RDDL Schematron Schema, Jonathan Borden
  • New W3C XML Schema facet ? [was: RDDL Schematron Schema], Eric van der Vlist
    • RE: New W3C XML Schema facet ? [was: RDDL Schematron Schema], Jonathan Borden
• ANN: Emacs WYSIWYG CALS table generator, Michael Smith
• Aelfred (SAX2) Support, Scerri, Antony (ELSLON)
  • Re: Aelfred (SAX2) Support, David Brownell
• Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema, Francesco Ricci
  • Message not available
    • Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema, Edd Dumbill
  • Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema, Ken North
    • Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema, Robin Cover
      • Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema, Dave Carlson
    • Open meeting (British Computer Society and XML UK, February 22,London, ), Ken North
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema, Arnold, Curt
  • RE: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema, Jean-Marc VANEL
  • RE: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema, Vegt, Jan
  • RE: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • FW: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema, Arnold, Curt
  • RE: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema, Vegt, Jan
    • Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema, RENOUPREZ Jean-Luc
      • Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema, Robin Cover
  • RE: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema, Robin Cover
• Suggestions for XML editors, Jean-Marc VANEL
  • Re: Suggestions for XML editors, Michael Smith
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Suggestions for XML editors, Jean-Marc VANEL
• Semantic Web Agreement Group, SWAG WG
• TREX to OASIS?, James Clark
• Re: Mapping a UML model to a DTD or Schema (fwd), Andrew Goodchild
• DTD attribute list syntax for referencing content, Dan Matthews
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DTD attribute list syntax for referencing content, Rick Jelliffe
• XML DOM Obj size limitations?, Newsha Makooi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML DOM Obj size limitations?, Newsha Makooi
• Name Space Question, Conrad, Bill (ThomasTech)
  • Re: Name Space Question, Norman Walsh
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Name Space Question, Mike Brown
  • RE: Name Space Question, Mike Brown
• XML auf Deutsch?, Fenton, Brigitte (ThomasTech)
  • Re: XML auf Deutsch?, Michael Beddow
• RE: XML DOM Object size limitations, Chris Loschen
  • RE: XML DOM Object size limitations, Robin LaFontaine
    • Re: XML DOM Object size limitations, Thomas B. Passin
    • Re: XML DOM Object size limitations, Anatole Tartakovsky
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: XML DOM Object size limitations, Philippe LAMBERT
• RE: XML DOM Object size limitations (MSDN), Newsha Makooi
• survey of pull-style parsers, Ken MacLeod
• Re: How do Name Spaces relate to Schemas?, Charles Reitzel
• Proposal for new RDDL natures and purpose, Eric van der Vlist
  • What is the nature of HTML 4.0? was RE: Proposal for new RDDL naturesand purpose, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: What is the nature of HTML 4.0? was RE: Proposal for new RDDLnaturesand purpose, Eric van der Vlist
      • What is the purpose of RDF Schema? was RE: What is the nature of HTML4.0?, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: What is the purpose of RDF Schema? was RE: What is the nature ofHTML4.0?, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: What is the purpose of RDF Schema? was RE: What is the natureofHTML4.0?, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: What is the nature of HTML 4.0? was RE: Proposal for new RDDLnatures and purpose, John Cowan
      • Re: What is the nature of HTML 4.0? was RE: Proposal for newRDDLnatures and purpose, Jonathan Borden
• FW: SIX 1.0 Spec. Online, Peter Jones
• RE: New W3C XML Schema facet ? [was: RDDL Schematron Schema], Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: New W3C XML Schema facet ? [was: RDDL Schematron Schema], Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Attribute-Value Normalization problem, Jianjun Zhang
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Attribute-Value Normalization problem, Richard Tobin
  • Re: Attribute-Value Normalization problem, Charles Reitzel
• Schema ambiguity detection algorithm for RELAX (1/4), K.Kawaguchi
• Schema ambiguity detection algorithm for RELAX (3/4), K.Kawaguchi
• Schema ambiguity detection algorithm for RELAX (4/4), K.Kawaguchi
• Schema ambiguity detection algorithm for RELAX (2/4), K.Kawaguchi
• MSXML Parser version/mode installed, Newsha Makooi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: MSXML Parser version/mode installed, Newsha Makooi
• XML and embedded systems, James Spink
  • Re: XML and embedded systems, John Wilson
  • Re: XML and embedded systems, Mark Baker
• Converting XML to ASCII, Mark McClure
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Converting XML to ASCII, Mark McClure
    • RE: Converting XML to ASCII, Robin Berjon
    • Re: Converting XML to ASCII, Christopher Martis
• urn:uuid:c2f41010-65b3-11d1-a29f-00aa00c14882/, Cox, Roger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: urn:uuid:c2f41010-65b3-11d1-a29f-00aa00c14882/, Charles Reitzel
    • Message not available
      • Re: urn:uuid:c2f41010-65b3-11d1-a29f-00aa00c14882/, Michael Mealling
• Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Joe English
    • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Dan Brickley
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Marcus Carr
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schemaambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), James Clark
    • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, K.Kawaguchi
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, James Clark
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, K.Kawaguchi
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Eric van der Vlist
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Michael Fitzgerald
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, K.Kawaguchi
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), K.Kawaguchi
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schemaambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), Thomas B. Passin
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), Bill dehOra
    • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schemaambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), Thomas B. Passin
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), Bill dehOra
    • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schemaambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), Thomas B. Passin
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re:Schemaambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), Mark Baker
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), Peter Jones
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), Bill dehOra
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [RDDL] Java Object Model, Jonathan Borden
  • Re: [RDDL] Java Object Model, Ken MacLeod
    • RE: [RDDL] Java Object Model, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: [RDDL] Java Object Model, Jeff Rafter
      • RE: [RDDL] Java Object Model, Jonathan Borden
    • #PCDATA with other elements, Huaxin Zhang
      • Re: #PCDATA with other elements, Rob Lugt
      • Re: #PCDATA with other elements, Bob Kline
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: [RDDL] Java Object Model, Michael Brennan
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Rick Jelliffe
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Clark C. Evans
    • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Eric van der Vlist
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Rick Jelliffe
    • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Jonathan Borden
    • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Joe English
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Eric van der Vlist
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Uche Ogbuji
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Uche Ogbuji
    • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Eric van der Vlist
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schemaambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), Rick Jelliffe
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schemaambiguitydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), Rick Jelliffe
• ANN: Unicorn XML Toolkit, Alexey Gokhberg
• [RDDL] Cache / Security Model, Jeff Rafter
  • Re: [RDDL] Cache / Security Model, Jonathan Borden
• XML editors: a spec. [was: Suggestions for XML editors], Jean-Marc VANEL
• XML Integration, Jon Ceanfaglione
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: XML Integration, Bill Cummings
    • Re: XML Integration, Anatole Tartakovsky
  • RE: XML Integration, Michael Brennan
• Deadline approaching for KT2001, Elledge, Marion
• Check XML for well formedness, gramanan
  • RE: Check XML for well formedness, Julian F. Reschke
• Accessing XSL tree after applying imports, John Sinnott
• MSXML Parser version/mode installed -- Follow up., Newsha Makooi
• The Division of Schema - A Practical Perspective (Re: Are we losingout because of grammars?), Jay Zhang
• What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?, Inga Eckermann
  • Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?, Caroline Clewlow
  • Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?, James Clark
  • Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?, Bob Kline
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?, Bob Kline
  • RE: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?, Bob Kline
  • RE: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
    • RE: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?, Bob Kline
      • RE: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?, David E. Cleary
      • appinfo considered harmful. Re: What is the advantage of RELAX incomparison to Schemas?, Jonathan Borden
      • RE: appinfo considered harmful. Re: What is the advantage of RELAX incomparison to Schemas?, David E. Cleary
      • Re: appinfo considered harmful. Re: What is the advantage of RELAXincomparison to Schemas?, Jonathan Borden
      • RE: appinfo considered harmful. Re: What is the advantage of RELAXincomparison to Schemas?, David E. Cleary
      • Re: appinfo considered harmful. Re: What is the advantage ofRELAXincomparison to Schemas?, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: appinfo considered harmful. Re: What is the advantage ofRELAXincomparison to Schemas?, Joe English
      • RE: appinfo considered harmful. Re: What is the advantageofRELAXincomparison to Schemas?, Jonathan Borden
      • Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?, Jonathan Borden
  • RE: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • Re: What is the advantage of RELAX in comparison to Schemas?, Rick Jelliffe
• ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released, Mike Geiger
  • Re: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released, Matt Sergeant
    • Re: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released, Nicolas Guzman
    • RE: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released, Robert C. Lyons
      • RE: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released, Clark C. Evans
      • RE: ANNOUNCE, Ramin Firoozye
      • Re: ANNOUNCE, Eric van der Vlist
      • RE: ANNOUNCE, Marek Kowalczyk
      • RE: ANNOUNCE, David LeBlanc
      • RE: ANNOUNCE, Bob Kline
      • RE: ANNOUNCE, Matt Sergeant
      • Re: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released, Ken North
      • RE: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released, Robert C. Lyons
      • Re: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released, Paul Tchistopolskii
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released, Eric Bohlman
  • RE: ANNOUNCE - PerXML Released, Mike Geiger
• Re: xml-dev-digest Digest #217, Murata Makoto
• RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Charles Reitzel
    • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Paul Tchistopolskii
      • Re: Are we losing out because of grammars?, Ken North
• How can I access the xsl import tree?, John Sinnott
  • Re: How can I access the xsl import tree?, Robin Berjon
• Disabling DTD Validation, Scerri, Antony (ELSLON)
• What IS a valid URI Reference?, David Hunter
• Disabling DTD Validation Cont., Scerri, Antony (ELSLON)
  • Re: Disabling DTD Validation Cont., Michael Beddow
  • Re: Disabling DTD Validation Cont., Bob Kline
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Disabling DTD Validation Cont., Scerri, Antony (ELSLON)
    • RE: Disabling DTD Validation Cont., Bob Kline
    • Re: Disabling DTD Validation Cont., Thomas B. Passin
    • Re: Disabling DTD Validation Cont., Rob Lugt
  • RE: Disabling DTD Validation Cont., Wayne Steele
• RE: ANNOUNCE, Mike.Champion
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: ANNOUNCE, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• [ANNOUNCE] PullParser 1.1, Aleksander Slominski
  • Message not available
    • Re: [ANNOUNCE] PullParser 1.1, Daniel Veillard
      • Haiku (was Re: ANNOUNCE), Jeff Rafter
• No Subject, ganesh_br
• Reg Validation of xml, ganesh_br
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Reg Validation of xml, Rick Jelliffe
  • RE: Reg Validation of xml, Arnold, Curt
• Wanted: GUI XML, Heinz Wehner
  • Re: Wanted: GUI XML, Miloslav Nic
    • Re: Wanted: GUI XML, olivier.dameron
  • Message not available
    • Re: Wanted: GUI XML, Daniel Veillard
  • Re: Wanted: GUI XML, Ian Graham
  • Re: Wanted: GUI XML, Thomas B. Passin
• [Ann.] XML Schema FAQ, Francis Norton
  • Re: [Ann.] XML Schema FAQ, Jeff Rafter
    • Re: [Ann.] XML Schema FAQ, Francis Norton
• Registrars of terminology (was Re: Are we losing out because ofgrammars?), Uche Ogbuji
• RE: Registrars of terminology (was Re: Are we losing out because ofgrammars?), Arnold, Curt
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Registrars of terminology (was Re: Are we losing out because ofgrammars?), Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• Re : Are we losing out because of grammars? (Re: Schema ambiguit ydetection algorithm for RELAX (1/4)), Vegt, Jan
• Re: Registrars of terminology, Uche Ogbuji
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Registrars of terminology, Bullard, Claude L (Len)
• External Controlled Vocabularies (was Re: Are we losing out becauseof grammars? ), Rick Jelliffe
• New to xml and trying to find sample implementation...., Atchuta Kumar
• XSLTUK conference/tutorial: last chance to register, Sebastian Rahtz,,,