[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DTD and Illegal Construct
- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- To: Jim Shain <Jim.Shain@alltel.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2001 15:59:48 -0500
Jim Shain wrote:
> I wanted to run this past some knowledgeable people. Is the following a legal
> or illegal construct for an element in a DTD?
>
> <!ELEMENT Request ((A, B, C?) | (A?, B, C?, D))>
>
> Some have stated that it is illegal because "When A is present it isn't possible
> to determine whether or not D is required."
Correct. Here is a correct declaration that does what you want:
<!ELEMENT Request ((A, B, C?, D?) | (B, C?, D))>
--
There is / one art || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
no more / no less || http://www.reutershealth.com
to do / all things || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
with art- / lessness \\ -- Piet Hein