Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)

["Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>]

Edd Dumbill wrote -

>
> OK, I'll try again on this.  It seems to me that the sort of bundles we
> might want to be able to apply to documents in an indirected fashion, we
> might also reasonably want to apply in a hardwired manner too.  The
> problem I think I want solving is some kind of reconciliation between
> the proliferation of things like:
>
>  ...
> or inline them when deemed necessary.

Yes, I think being able to include the catalog in the document itself could be
very valuable, and we ought to make sure that it's possible as an option.

Cheers,

Tom P