[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)

From: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>
To: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 20:46:04 -0800

At 09:48 PM 02/01/01 -0500, Thomas B. Passin wrote:

>Yes, I think being able to include the catalog in the document itself could be
>very valuable, and we ought to make sure that it's possible as an option.

Multipart-mime arguably gives you that for free, and there's even
a URI scheme for pointing at it.  Seems real clean to me. -Tim

References:
- RE: Namespace or document gloss?
  - From: Miles Sabin <MSabin@interx.com>
- Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
  - From: Edd Dumbill <edd@usefulinc.com>
- Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
  - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>

Prev by Date: Transfering XML Documents Using HTTP Post - Objects vs text <or> myenvironment or yours
Next by Date: Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
Previous by thread: Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)
Next by thread: RE: Related resources
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread