Re: Related resources (was Re: Namespace or document gloss?)

[Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>]

From: Edd Dumbill <edd@usefulinc.com>

> The way I see it I'm looking for a standard way (by which I mean a
> vocabulary and syntax(es) on which we all agree) to describe related
> resources, and then ways to attach these to a namespace, a document, or
> a document fragment--or inline them when deemed necessary.  Can others
> see this use case?

For an example of the kind of related-resource decription that could be
pointed to, see my DrLove at http://www.ascc.net/~ricko/drlove.htm

Rick Jelliffe
Academia Sinica