[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: A Light Rant On Ontological Commitment
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: Bill dehOra <BdehOra@interx.com>, email@example.com
- Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2001 10:57:00 -0600
Thanks! Did they put a condensed version
on the web? I am losing the battle with the
information firehose these days.
One might note that such encounters and strategies
can be classified as "creative" and "non-creative"
encounters. The former not only allow ambiguity,
they embrace it. That is why I see mostly fixed
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Bill dehOra [mailto:BdehOra@interx.com]
Today must be citation day :) Rosenschein and Zlotkin's book, "Rules of
Encounter" is good stuff and all about applying game theoretics to machine