[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XPointer and Sun patent
- From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
- To: email@example.com
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 10:28:18 +0100
On Mon, Jan 15, 2001 at 06:03:36PM -0500, Paul W. Abrahams wrote:
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 07:12:29PM -0500, Paul W. Abrahams wrote:
> > > Seems to me that by the statement "XPointer is affected by a
> > > technology patent held by Sun Microsystems.", the XPointer
> > > spec is assuming the validity of the patent. Couldn't W3C
> > > cover its backside without endorsing the patent by replacing
> > > "is" by "might be"?
> > Yes, that's a problem, I don't think W3C did intent to endorse
> > the patent validity, but unfortunately the text signaling the claim
> > seems to present it as accepted. I'm pretty sure this will be
> > corrected.
> Does my suggested text replacement make the appropriate correction?
This sentence will for sure be rewritten, I can't tell right now
if your suggestion will be the one used.
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
firstname.lastname@example.org | libxml Gnome XML toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/