[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XPointer and Sun patent
- From: "Paul W. Abrahams" <email@example.com>
- To: Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr
- Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 18:03:36 -0500
Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 11, 2001 at 07:12:29PM -0500, Paul W. Abrahams wrote:
> > Seems to me that by the statement "XPointer is affected by a
> > technology patent held by Sun Microsystems.", the XPointer
> > spec is assuming the validity of the patent. Couldn't W3C
> > cover its backside without endorsing the patent by replacing
> > "is" by "might be"?
> Yes, that's a problem, I don't think W3C did intent to endorse
> the patent validity, but unfortunately the text signaling the claim
> seems to present it as accepted. I'm pretty sure this will be
Does my suggested text replacement make the appropriate correction?