[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- To: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 13:00:15 +0000
"Jonathan Borden" <jborden@mediaone.net> writes:
<snip/>
> Is there a URI you suggest we use as the xl:arcrole for an XSD or are
> you saying that we should create one? (Remember that under most
> circumstances the xl:arcrole alone can be used to disambiguate resources)
> Perhaps we might use the URI of the specification itself?
I was with you right to this point. I have exactly the opposite
inclination, namely that the xl:role is all I normally will need to
look at. If I'm a schema validator, I'm going to special-case
situations in which there is only one resource with xl:link=the NS uri
for the schema language I validate with. Release 1 will probably punt
all other situations. I _really_, _really_ want to get to the point
where I can have the bare minimum to declare victory, namely:
<html xmlns:html='.../xhtml'>
. . .
<rddl:resource xl:type='simple'
xl:role='http://www.w3.org/2000/10/XMLSchema'
xs:href='http://www.example.com/Schemas/myns.xsd'/>
<rddl:resource xl:type='simple'
xl:role='http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform'
xs:href='http://www.example.com/Stylesheets/myns.xsl'/>
<rddl:resource xl:type='simple'
xl:role='http://www.w3.org/1999/XML/namespace'
xs:href='http://www.example.com/DTDs/myns.dtd'/>
. . .
</html>
With respect, I don't ever program in Java, and I couldn't care less
about the details of the Java API: please let's focus the design on
the document.
ht
--
Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh
W3C Fellow 1999--2001, part-time member of W3C Team
2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440
Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk
URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/
- References:
- RE: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
- From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names, was: Re: Quick edit
- From: ht@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Henry S. Thompson)
- RDDL: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatch on related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
- From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way to dispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
- Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
- From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
- From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
- Re: Should xlink:arcrole or xlink:role be the primary way todispatchon related resources? was Re: URIs, names and well known RDDL names,
- From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>