[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: XHTML m12n XSD
- From: "Sean B. Palmer" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>,Rick Jelliffe <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 20:52:09 +0000
> In other words, a fine topic for gnashing until next Christmas.
Yes! I've already been firmly gnashed on this topic, which I could never
understand, but I'm ready for a calmer discussion about it. Hopefully,
xml-dev will be a bit more open about it...
> Why was the section on XLinks not done?
Note that a lot of it is incomplete. I don't know Rick means about the
"XHTML XLink module", because as far as I'm concened, there isn't an XLink
module in XHTML 1.1/m12n. But never mind... Rick can write one, and then
we'll have XLink in XHTML, so don't let on to him :-)
Actually, I think we should all give Rick a big round of applause for a
valiant first effort... it isn't easy as I know (I modularized a version of
XHTML Basic using similar principles when the argument came round the first
time). And I only did it for Basic, Rick is doing it for the whole lot of
m12n (I presume).
I'm still disappointed that he spells XHTML wrongly in the title :-)
Sean B. Palmer
"Perhaps, but let's not get bogged down in semantics."
- Homer J. Simpson, BABF07.