[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: XHTML m12n XSD
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <email@example.com>,Rick Jelliffe <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 14:41:35 -0600
In other words, a fine topic for gnashing until
next Christmas. Fantastic! The semantic stuff
was running out of firewood. I noted that in
Rick's article, he mentions in a comment that
there is place for RDF.
What would be the role of the RDF would
in the XHTML schema?
Why was the section on XLinks not done? Time
or conceptual problems?
I think the XHTML Schema should be a top priority.
Really, it might help XHTML become popular. :-)
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Sean B. Palmer [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
In conclusion, an XML Schema version of m12n is at best extremely
experimental, and makes for a volatile subject. Please always keep in mind
that there are advantages *and* disadvantages. Personally, I have no
objections to it, and welcome any further improvements (in the "why not?"
manner), and may contribute further at a later date :-)