[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: How could RDDL be distributed ?
- From: Leigh Dodds <email@example.com>
- To: xml-dev <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2001 13:50:41 +0000
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric van der Vlist [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: 16 January 2001 11:01
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: How could RDDL be distributed ?
> Going back to our roots, SGML and XML have felt the need to separate the
> formal identifier of the document type from the location of the DTD and
> I think there is still this need with namespaces and that one should be
> able to separate the location of the RDDL document from the namespace
> that is the "name" of a vocabulary.
I agree. However won't this functionality be provided by the NAMESPACE entry
is the xmlcat work, as noted by Paul Grosso in ?
As Paul notes this would allow a local URI (resolving to an RDDL document)
used instead of the NS-URI itself.
Leigh Dodds, Systems Architect | "Pluralitas non est ponenda
http://weblogs.userland.com/eclectic | sine necessitate"
http://www.xml.com/pub/xmldeviant | -- William of Ockham