[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0)

From: Dave Winer <dave@userland.com>
To: xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2001 08:32:30 -0800

> You could do worse than Simon's XMLhack story on it:

Thanks Edd. I'm linking to your article on Scripting News and just ran a
quick DaveNet.

http://davenet.userland.com/2001/01/12/theW3cAPatentJakobNielsenAndSun

Dave

References:
- RE: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  - From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  - From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
- Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  - From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
  - From: "Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@home.com>
- Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0)
  - From: Dave Winer <dave@userland.com>
- Re: Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0)
  - From: Edd Dumbill <edd@usefulinc.com>

Prev by Date: RE: And the DTD says, "I'm NOT dead yet!!"
Next by Date: Re: Turning off validation (was Re: Schemas and entities)
Previous by thread: Re: Patent controversy (was Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0)
Next by thread: Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread