[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Are we losing out because of grammars?
- From: "Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <email@example.com>
- To: Eric van der Vlist <firstname.lastname@example.org>, email@example.com
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:56:21 -0600
The point is that to decide among means, one must
bound the definition of system first. Otherwise we
spend a lot of time debating means without requirements.
Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h
From: Eric van der Vlist [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
You're right that there is probably nothing very new here, but I am
afraid I don't get your point.
Do you mean that such large systems cannot be modeled, that a single
model cannot be shared by all the involved parties or that schema
languages should try to (better) take this requirement into account ?