[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (Second) Last Call for XPointer 1.0
- From: Ann Navarro <email@example.com>
- To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <firstname.lastname@example.org>, Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr,email@example.com
- Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2001 16:45:21 -0500
At 09:35 AM 1/9/01 -0500, Elliotte Rusty Harold wrote:
>There's a much more significant issue raised in this draft for the
>first time than the question of how to map namespace prefixes. It's
>also come to light in this draft that Sun claims a patent on some of
>the technologies needed to implement XPointer.
>I think this is particularly offensive because Eve L. Maler, a Sun
>employee, serves as co-chair of the XML Linking Working Group and a
>co-editor of the XPointer specification.
Without commenting on the merits of the patent claim as it applies to
XPointer -- and taking a neutral stance on anyone's prior knowledge of the
patent in question, it is exceedingly difficult for WG members and AC Reps
from large companies with even larger intellectual property inventories to
participate in the standards process and be fully aware, one way or the
other, of whether their company has any IP that needs to be disclosed.
There are requirements for disclosure in various steps in the process, Eve
may have not been aware of them at the beginning, and disclosed as
That said, a resolution to a patent claim that requires modifications to be
given to the W3C seems improbable, if not impossible to enforce (who would?
If the W3C membership doesn't like this stipulation, it can recommend that
the draft not advance to Recommendation until a better alternative is found.
I'd not be surprised to see a request for prior art to go out, and if
anyone here feels strongly that there is, then communicating it along the
proper channels (Daniel Weisner as mentioned in the quoted URL is a good
start) would be great.
My rather long-winded point is essentially not to hold Eve completely
responsible for the situation; she's in an incredibly difficult position,
both before and after awareness and disclosure of the patent claim.
Ann Navarro, Author and Chief Geek
WebGeek, Inc. http://www.webgeek.com
Now Available! - XHTML By Example -