RE: XHTML m12n XSD

["Bullard, Claude L (Len)" <clbullar@ingr.com>]

Yikes.  Sorry to hear about the mishap.  Being about 
90 miles south of Nashville, if it is ice related, 
I understand.  We've had a cold cold winter.  I hope 
that goes well.

I don't quite understand the rest of it.   Maybe some 
of these issues can be exposed and help obtained from 
XML-Dev by discussing them in the context of Rick's 
draft paper.  There are certainly some experienced 
eyeballs out here and discussing the draft let's those 
who must respect W3C confidentiality rules do both.

Len 
http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard

Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti.
Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h


-----Original Message-----
From: Ann Navarro [mailto:ann@webgeek.com]

At 03:14 PM 1/4/01 -0600, Bullard, Claude L (Len) wrote:

>Wouldn't an XLink module be a good thing to have?

Now there's another hairball. A newly published document (that I haven't 
had time to read, unfortunately we had a family mishap over the New Year's 
holiday, and I've been in Nashville dealing with it until this morning) --

XHTML has had constraints from WAI regarding multiple attributes of type 
URI, which XLink hasn't allowed -- this is now supposed to be allowed, or 
there's some assertion that XHTML doesn't have to do linking that way, but 
the jury would certainly be out for a long session on that idea.