[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Namespace related-resource bundles: just the one?
- From: Uche Ogbuji <email@example.com>
- To: Jonathan Borden <firstname.lastname@example.org>
- Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 09:35:00 -0700 (MST)
Well, until I get my dump of XML-DEV mail for the last 24 hours (others
have confirmed this listserv bug in private)...
> > > As a consequence it looks as though we wouldn't be able to take
> > > an _existing_ document instance (which already references a
> > > resource bundle via it's namespace URI) and, for example,
> > > associate it with a different XML or RDF schema without
> > > negotiating with the controllers of the existing bundle URI.
> I was thinking in terms of an entity resolver which would by default
> dereference a namespace URI to get the catalog, but could be given a local
> catalog as an override.
> I was also thinking that a parser might associate a catalog with each
> namespace and use the appropriate catalog depending on the element being
I prefer the PI approach to this because it allows one to codify and
distribute namespace catalog alternatives without needing to distribute
code, and in a more transparent way. I thinkk, however, there is plenty
of room for both approaches.
Uche Ogbuji Principal Consultant
email@example.com +1 303 583 9900 x 101
Fourthought, Inc. http://Fourthought.com
4735 East Walnut St, Ste. C, Boulder, CO 80301-2537, USA
Software-engineering, knowledge-management, XML, CORBA, Linux, Python