[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Textual transmission typically faster?
- From: Eugene Kuznetsov <eugene@datapower.com>
- To: David Megginson <david@megginson.com>, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2001 09:41:52 -0500
> I recall one of the presenters at XTech last year had been
> experimenting with using a Java-serialized DOM rather than the source
> XML document, and was surprised to find that the Java-serialized DOM
> was both considerably larger than the *uncompressed* XML and
> considerably slower to load.
That shouldn't be surprising -- generally speaking a parse tree is
larger than the text input to the parser. (And java serialization
doesn't win any awards for efficiency in either time or space).
However, a binary representation of the same data (specified in
ASN.1 and encoded using BER, say) would be much smaller and more
efficient.
\\ Eugene Kuznetsov
\\ eugene@datapower.com
\\ DataPower Technology, Inc.